Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File i!f2059 <br />September 15, 1995 <br />Page 5 <br />Sta^ Recommendation <br />Following is a punch lis. of items for « <br />i-« issues noted below are addressed in the attached <br />materials. <br />• rs3, vrr.is'J S’" <br />justification? <br />doe^s Planning Commission accept the revegetation plan as adequate. <br />• Is the project necessary or are there alternatives? <br />Unc vfPWD adeauately addressed mitigation of wetland per Wetland■ £—’hs- r=»«s"’rs <br />subwatershed? <br />cnm •, .afetv standpoint for the finished pond, does Planning Commission concur <br />AaMhe accL road should be gated? Does Planning Commission have any <br />concerns regarding the potential for this area to become an "attractive nuisance . <br />. Are there any concerns of the property owners, Mr. and Mrs. Pierce, that the <br />City should be aware of and address? <br />The following questions and possible concerns relate specifically to the construction process: <br />If Medina forces traffic from this winter's Deer Hill Road project on to the <br />' Tnmara^wcounw Road 6 intersection, how will MCWD address safety concerns? <br />whMf* this is not stricilv a planning issue related to the County Road 6 project, <br />rh rman Pe'erson lives at the northwest quadrant of this intersection, and other <br />"sion S';ruve within a shon distance of this area and use this road <br />often, and may have specific comments . . . <br />D rrtina the Countv Road 6 project scheduled for 1997/1998, does Plannmg <br />. Regarding ^ ^ conditional use permit/v.ariance resolution <br />SCwr^m no^'pire after one year, but estend to the expected star.