Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br />July 24, 2023 <br />6:00 o’clock p.m. <br />_____________________________________________________________________________________ <br /> <br />Page 5 of 11 <br /> <br />Johnson said his proposal would be to have staff draft the approval so the applicants know that the City is <br />approving the process, but the approval doesn't get ratified until the next City Council meeting. He said <br />that would give the applicant, neighbors, and engineers time to talk and if something were to come up <br />there would be an opportunity to remove approval from the consent agenda at the next meeting and <br />discuss it further. <br /> <br />Johnson moved, Crosby seconded, to have staff draft the approval for Resolution 7387 amending it <br />to include the adjustment of the wall at the corners and to maximize the screenage of the <br />vegetation. VOTE: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br /> <br />In a continuation of the Community Development Report, Community Development Director Oakden <br />said the department has continued to be busy with permits and on-site inspections. They are working <br />through about 10 applications for the next Planning Commission meeting as well as text amendments and <br />code enforcement. <br /> <br />CITY ATTORNEY REPORT <br /> <br />Attorney Mattick said he had nothing to report beyond the items scheduled for the closed session later <br />that evening. <br /> <br />CITY ADMINISTRATOR/ENGINEER REPORT <br /> <br />11. OLD PUBLIC WORKS FACILITY REMODEL (23-044)-DESIGN PROPOSAL <br /> <br />Edwards updated the City Council, noting staff is looking for guidance on a way forward on fire facilities. <br />The resolution passed at the time of the needs assessment approval called for the staff to seek a proposal <br />from an architect on the design for the remodel of the existing public works facility into a permanent fire <br />house. That was done with Oertel, the current architectural firm working on the new public works facility. <br />The task was to provide a facility for the Orono Fire Department. The challenges are that the existing <br />facilities Station One and Two would require renovation and maintenance totaling a couple million <br />dollars over the next few years. The other complication is that Station One is co-owned with the City of <br />Long Lake and the current litigation hampers any access of either those facilities right now. Remodel of <br />the existing public works facility into a permanent fire station is possible, but it is costly and not <br />necessarily ideally suited to the purpose, he said. He suggested the Council take a more incremental and <br />phased approach and engage the architecture firm to help with some temporary facility needs that would <br />last until the City could get full access to the existing facilities and get those fully remodeled. Orono <br />bonded for $3 million for fire facilities. The remodel of the existing public works facility would be about <br />$3.5 million, leaving no funds currently identified to do any upgrades to the other facilities. Use of the old <br />public works building as a permanent fire department may also require some significant structural <br />improvements, he said. The predicted occupancy for the building would be September 2025. The other <br />consideration would be architect’s fees estimated at $295,000. <br /> <br />Veach asked about use of the old public works facility after its use as a temporary fire facility. <br /> <br />Edwards said it has potential as a recreational facility and some grants may be available for that. There <br />are many things that would need to happen to that building regardless of its eventual usage such as <br />roofing and mechanical, he said. There are some things that would be different such as air handling needs.