Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />February 21,2023 <br />6:00 o'clock p.m. <br />Ms. Yorks responded it's a problem that they caused themselves. There were things that had to be <br />corrected,probably,but not to this extent. She said she had photos which Curtis did not have available. <br />McCutcheon invited her to pass her phone around the table. <br />Curtis clarified that the applicant's engineer has approved plans as designed. We don't approve their <br />engineering,their civil engineer takes the responsibility by stamping the plans. <br />Ms.Yorks said the work is too egregious.And then after-the-fact,I mean, come on,really?The whole <br />thing is just egregious. I get that it was an emergency. <br />McCutcheon said it's one of those things with the construction season, and I'm not trying to make <br />excuses,but I'm just trying to be logical about it.If you start pulling back layers of the onion and you're <br />holding that much earth back,you do have to act with a sense of urgency.Was it handled the best way? <br />Obviously,we would like them to go to City first,which they did. They came in--well, after-the-fact, of <br />course,but they did try to make it right. <br />Margaret Martin,2821 Casco Point Road. I sent in this information earlier in an email and it is from a <br />member of the family who is a civil engineer, a geotech.You have all that information and I won't go <br />through all of the points,but I will just reiterate a couple of the things that he emphasized.He indicated <br />that the wall does not appear to be replaced in-kind and therefore should fall under scrutiny of new <br />construction.It increases impervious surfaces within the buffer, increases discharge to the lake and does <br />not appear that anything has been done to naturalize the shoreline, and I understand timeframe with <br />winter etc.,that that can't be addressed immediately. Surface drainage pads have not been identified. Tree <br />Removal completed prior to plan approval has been discussed. The damage caused by this disturbance <br />may put neighboring properties at risk in the future and this has been addressed. So again,you have a <br />printed version and this is from an engineer who is very knowledgeable.But moreover,we need to <br />consider the fact that that allowing things to go through sets precedents that should not be given in our <br />City so that people think they can get away with it and do things not according to how they're set up. <br />These rules were set up by our City and should be complied with. <br />Commissioners took some time to review the photos that Ms.Worth and Curtis had been able to access. <br />Tyler Warnke,2147 Valley View Place, St.Paul said he was the equipment operator on the shop. I just <br />want to reiterate that I went off what the plans were. I've never seen a slope this steep.And in order to get <br />to the bottom,I had to dig around that. They said it was a road. It did look like a road but I can't reach all <br />the way down to the bottom to pull out the timbers. So we're pulling up timbers going down as we go. <br />Some of them are eight feet back and I have to dig those out.I'm not going to leave those in the ground, <br />because when I construct the new walls,I have to go back. I`ve got to do the tie back. So it's different <br />than just digging a hole. I've got to put a six foot to eight foot chunk on the back to nail the tie back to,to <br />hold the wall., so all that has to be dug out. There's different aspects that made that difficult.Up on the top <br />there's a tree and the neighbors were adamant about leaving the tree. So we worked around that and did <br />what we could to keep it.And that's why there's a little adjustment over on that side just to keep and not <br />destroy the roots on that tree. But it's just it's a big job,no doubt about it.A lot of the stuff had to be dug <br />Page 4 of 19