Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE <br /> ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING <br /> July 24,2023 <br /> 6:00 o'clock p.m. <br /> City Planner Curtis explained In July of 2022 the timber walls,deck and stair to the lake were destroyed <br /> by fire. In March of 2023 the City Council reviewed an after-the-fact variance request for the new <br /> retaining walls as construction was found to have expanded beyond the in-kind allowance of the <br /> administrative building permit. Because there were a number of concerns,the Council tabled the <br /> application to allow the applicants to redesign and provide clarification and supporting engineering. The <br /> applicant has provided a wall plan with engineering reflecting a design as close to in-kind as they were <br /> able to achieve, a landscape plan and a plan for the permitted lake access stair deck and shed. Earlier this <br /> summer with the City's approval the contractor made modifications and corrections to the as-constructed <br /> walls which were necessary in order to improve structural stability. The proposed replacement deck and <br /> shed will not encroach closer to the lake than the previously existing structures. The lake stairs are an <br /> allowed improvement within the 75-foot setback and can be constructed,along with the shed and deck, <br /> with an administrative building permit.The applicant is requesting after-the-fact setback variances to <br /> address the replacement wall footprint expansions in the bluff. Comments from the public were received. <br /> Replacement of destroyed walls is essential, Curtis said, due to the bluff and steep nature on the property <br /> as well as the immediately adjacent neighboring properties. The variance to permit the expanded retaining <br /> wall structure within the bluff and 75-foot setback will help to maintain the existing slope and character <br /> of the area. Staff recommends approval as proposed.The applicants and some neighbors were present. <br /> Mark and Lisa Thostenson,2815 Casco Point Road,the applicants, said they have been communicating <br /> with their neighbors and doing their best to address concerns. <br /> Walsh said it is a complicated project and he recalls the biggest issues were bringing the grade back to <br /> where it was,making sure the neighbors were protected and whether the engineering design would add <br /> height to the top wall or add an additional top wall. He asked how it was determined that the contractor <br /> had not done everything according to plan. <br /> Lisa Thostenson said she and her husband had no idea that the plan wasn't followed exactly by the <br /> contractor. They sent photos to the engineer and that is how they discovered there were some things that <br /> they weren't comfortable with and requested assistance from the City. <br /> Paul Schimnowski with Criterium-Schimnowski Engineers, 161 Dunbar Way,Mahtomedi,Minnesota, <br /> the engineer of record,said he had received some construction progress photos from the homeowners and <br /> noticed some things that were not done per plan. He notified everyone involved and ended up ending the <br /> contract and service agreement with the contractor.He said he had not seen the neighbors' questions until <br /> the meeting but thought most could be easily answered.Matching the old bluff height was an important <br /> consideration on this project,he said,and a height of 961 feet nearly from one side to the other with just a <br /> little bit of step down at each end will provide substantial additional support for the neighbors' properties <br /> on each side. He noted they are still under a stop-work order and did some remedial repairs to the <br /> existing work. The request is for a setback variance and not necessarily the wall approval. <br /> Curtis also said the variance is for the location and placement of the walls. If there are any other technical <br /> details,that is typically part of the building permit. <br /> Patty Yorks,2825 Casco Point Road, said her biggest concern is that the wall doesn't blend in with the <br /> shoreline and asked about the landscape plan. She felt some of the proposed plantings were too short. <br /> Page 2 of 11 <br />