My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
12-08-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:43:12 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:39:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
i I <br />I 1 <br />BONESTROO AND ASSOCIATES <br />Bonestroo <br />Rosene <br />Anderlik & <br />Associates <br />Engineers & Architects <br />November 13, 1997 <br />Ms. Eli7.abeih Van Zomcioii <br />Cily Planner/Zoning A»iniini.sirator <br />City of Orono <br />P«)5I Office Bon 66 <br />Crystal Bay. Minnesota 5332.3 <br />Re. Lake Minnelonk.i Woi>d.s <br />File No. I39-2.10H <br />^612 6361311 11/1A/97 10:33 l3 :02/02 N0:162 <br />»«a .»•»./ 9.i »f»*» »»»* •%.«#» r f » • I </• •• • i> * | <br />I It Is* ^ ’ H« u If* •. •' . 1*1 • ti • ' <A M« Jr • «.a 1*^ • V *i » •*’ < • * »i « ’• ► • <br />1^1 • •',fr*i.ir f si,'!* fl a bi.ftr.'l IS T'iifSit n» I I • A Hntii'Jk fi ♦ ► • <br />M Wr*.c*'r »'l <||||1 M ►rn»lifi i mA. *rrn,n l .^n-.iiif tf i(« <br />i*.i A .1 l*L • Rc'lh A m »'► t .P*M f| I. 'U i*» • <br />\Af Fii'.U-i. Hb • O.iv 111 «) • |A • M.i»* A M.tmoii |'f • <br />Ml» Mflifl T iJ.UltiM.efSM I’l a Iril Kf*r<>l • ► • amr>* jn h AiVJi i wil N PllUS Kb # <br />P Vi'ilN Hiijufs Kb I \ • W'»0r'l ► *t .||in |r <br />rf'br,,*., Cf A‘i.»r*i»tr» v4/*'i**i*«' .'I'*} S’ ( M.% • A!..vs •««ai . \l> i <br />Dear Liz. <br />We have reviewed the rcsiacd preliminary construction plans for the proposed Lake Minnetonka Wood.s planned <br />residential devciopmeni consisting of 30 townhomes. The site is located on Lob 2 and 3 and the west 6.29 feet of <br />Lot 4, Block 9. Townsiic of Langtion, along the north side of CSAH 15 We have the following comments in <br />regards to engineering nuaicr.s. <br />1 UtUitiaa: The sanitary sewer and water main designs appear acceptable from an engineering standpoint. Details <br />should be provided with ilic final plan set Our expectation is that Livingston Avenue will be extended westcily <br />sometime in the future We would recommend extending the sanitary and water main stubs to the west property line <br />as port of this project. .Service loeHiions should be shown on the final plans with sanitary serv ices located 3 feel <br />downstream from watci services <br />2, Drainage: The drauunjc area map should include the boundary for flows to the nonherly wetland and CB 33 to <br />verify that the proposed 12-inch RCP under Livingston Avenue is adequate. The 20 minute time of concentration <br />used for some of the CHlculaiu»ns scorns high for this site. We would recommend revising the storm sewer and <br />ponding calculations lor tlcvcloped conditions using a maximum lime of concentration of IS minutes. Pipe grades <br />and / or pipe siecn |>ctwcvn CB32 and STMH 31 may need to be rcvisetl. A paved swale or some type of erosion <br />control measure should he provided at the downstream end of the ft-inch HDPH pipe. Details of the pond outlet <br />control structure and bullied wcir should be provided for review. The limber weir may be a future maintenance <br />problem. The City muy wani to consider nn uliernaiivo outlet structure design without the weir where skimming is <br />provided by a .submerged mlci pipe to the structure. <br />3. Streets: 'ITic 19 units being served by the temporary cuLde-sac on Livingston Avenue exceeds the maximum of <br />10 units allowed by City si.indards. The horizontal alignment proposed for Livingston Avenue does not meet the <br />City standard for 30 mpli design. The radii should be increased to 275 feet or reduced speed warning Signs installed. <br />All propo.scd vertical cuiuis do meet the 30 mph design standard. We would recommend that Livingston Avenue be <br />consuucicd 10 ihe wesicily lui line as part of this project. The proposed driveway to serve the 11 units on Blocks ^ <br />and 4 docs not meet any of the City design .standards for private streets relative to right-of-way width, minimum <br />paved width or muxinuim nmnlK'r of units on a cul-de-sac. Emergency vehicle access to those units un Blocks 3 and <br />4 will be a problem omi tin City should review the plan.s with the appropriate emergency officials. Typical street <br />sections should he provided lor Livingston Avenue and the private drive. A gcotechnicol analysis and R value <br />recommendaiinn should he suhmilted to verify the proposed pavement design. <br />Please contact me at 604 4h(>3 i I you have any questions regarding this matter. <br />Yours very truly. <br />DONF..STROO. ROSENl .. ANDERLIK. & ASSOCIATES. INC. <br />/Oryyl <br />Tom Kellogg <br />2335 West Highwity 36 • St. Paul. MN 55113 • 612-636*4600 • Faw
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.