Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />REQUEST FOR COUNCIL ACTION <br />DATE: August 21, 1997 <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Administi ator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: #2264 Janet C. Kieman, 1491 Shoreline Drive - Variance - Resolution <br />Zoning District: LR-IA, Single Family Lakeshore Residential, 2 acres, sewer installation in <br />progress. <br />Application: Revised side setback, lake setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover <br />variances to construct additions to the existing residence. <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution <br />B - Notice of Planning Commission Action <br />C - Revised Final Proposed Site Plan and Elevations <br />D - Memo and Exhibits of 8/15/97 <br />Summary of Request <br />Applicant was granted variances in September 1996 to permit the construction of additions and <br />revise the roof of the existing residence, portions of which were loca-. ’ in the 0-75' lakeshore <br />setback zone, constituting hardcover and structure in that zone. A portion of the additions and <br />revisions encroached on the average lakeshore setback as well as the 30 required side yard <br />setback T>e original application was intended as a remodeling and addition project which was <br />based tSit. existing residence structure remaining substantially in place. Approval was granted <br />via Resoiuiion #3761 adopted September 9, 1996. <br />In June 1997 when the building permit was applied for, staff found that applicant now intended <br />to remove the entire superstructure of the residence and reuse only parts of the foundation. It was <br />also found that the plans submitted for the building permit had been significantly revised from <br />those used to gain variance approval in 1996. Specifically, there was a new encroachment into <br />the 0-75 ’ setback as well as an additional encroachment into the 30’ side setback. <br />Staff concluded that these new encroachments and the intent to completely remove the existing <br />residence, triggered the need for additional setback variances as well as a lot area and width <br />variance, providing the City with an opportunity to have the new construction substantially meet