My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
12-08-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:43:12 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:39:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
Navarre Housing Study <br />Table 1.15 <br />Perceived Affordability of Housing <br />Houses in Neighborhood are Affordable yes no don't know no response <br />Area I 25 (63%)2 (5%)11 (28%)2 (5%)Area II 23 (82%)2 (7%)3(11%)n/a <br />Area II 10(77%)1 (8%)2(15%)n/a <br />Area IV 35(85 n/a 4(10%)2 (5%) <br />Total 93 (75%)5 (4%)20(16%)4 (3%) <br />Residents were asked if they felt houses in the neighborhood are affordable. Three out of <br />four respondents indicated that houses in their neighborhood are affordable. This <br />response rate strongly coincided with the response for the previous question. Overall, <br />there appeared to be strong agreement that the housing in the neighborhood is affordable. <br />This study area comprises the majority of Orono ’s affordable housing stock. <br />Table 1.16 <br />Stability of Neighborhood Property Valiie<; <br />Stable Neighborhood Property Values yes no <br />Area I <br />Area II <br />Area II <br />Area IV <br />don't know no response <br />Total <br />17(43%) 4(10%) <br />17(61%) 3(11%) <br />9 (69%) n/a <br />23 (56%) 6(15%) <br />16(40%) 3(8%) <br />8 (29%) n/a <br />4(31%) n/a <br />10(24%) 2(5%) <br />66(54%) 13(11%) 38(31%) 5(4%) <br />Residents were asked if they felt property values in the neighborhood were a concern. <br />The stability of property values did not appear to be a concern. The majority of <br />respondents agree that property values were stable. <br />Table 1.17 <br />Perception of Houses on Respondents Block Being in Good Conditinn <br />Houses on Block in Good Condition yes no <br />Area I <br />Area II <br />Area II <br />Area IV <br />Total <br />don't know no response <br />18(45%) <br />15(54%) <br />10(77%) <br />22 (54% <br />12(30%) <br />11 (39%) <br />1 (8%) <br />15(37%) <br />8 (20%) <br />2 (7%) <br />2(15%) <br />2 (5%) <br />2 (5%) <br />n/a <br />n/a <br />2 (5%) <br />65 (53%) 39(27%) 14(11%) 4(3%) <br />Respondents were asked if they felt the houses on their block were in good condition. <br />There w^ no consensus on this issue. While the highest proportion said yes, a very large <br />number indicated otherwise. In Area III there was overwhelming agreement that the <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.