My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
12-08-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
12-08-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:43:12 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:39:02 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
444
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 17,1997 <br />use the garage entr>- as well. Gleason feels the courtyards will be attractive and be private <br />with the trees surrounding them. Any problem would be more for guests than for the <br />residents. Gleason said there was the possibility of moving the two middle units forward <br />and placing a service door on the side of the garage. Gleason did not believe this was an <br />however, with only four units per building. McMillan said some privacy would beissue, <br />lost by the middle units with walking traffic going back and forth, <br />McMillan asked about snow plowing. Gleason said the shoveling will be provided by the <br />homeowners association. He added that the area would be very wooded and walkways <br />will wind around the treed areas. Gleason thought the courtyards will be used by the <br />residents noting there are patios by the front doors as well. <br />Lindquist noted the issues of the 6" loop or sprinkler, hammerhead, landscaping <br />recommendations, and fire chief report have been reviewed. Van Zomeren said she <br />would like to know what the applicant is required to do regarding the road. Lindquist <br />iiidicated the 22' width and hammerhead would be a sufficient tradeoff for preserving <br />trees and was satisfactory with the fire chief <br />Hawn asked if a 22' width was the ma.ximum that could be provided. Gleason did not <br />know if any wider road could be provided and did not see any reason to expand that <br />width. The length is more of a concern but is solved with the use of a hammerhead. <br />Gappa noted the difference between single family and tovvnhome units and the ordinance <br />applying to single family residences. He thought the shorter length was a trade-off. <br />Van Zomeren said the preliminar plat and PRD Nvill move forward to the Council for <br />their review. Conformity to subdivision regulations will be reviewed. A letter of credit
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.