My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
11-24-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:37:11 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:35:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 10,1997 <br />(#13 “ 1998 Non-Union Compensation Adjustments - Continued) <br />Goetten voiced concern that the non-union pay and benefits adjustments seem Jx <br />driven by the union contract settlements. <br />Peterson asked if the City accepted the health insurance renewal amounts or investigates <br />other options. Moorse said the City has not gone out independently for insurance bids. <br />Jabbour said the City could still investigate costs elsewhere. Moorse was doubtful of the <br />City obtaining a better rate on its own. Jabbour said that would not necessarily be the <br />case as average age may reflect in higher fees. Moorse said the issue can be reviewed. <br />Kelley voiced the problem with getting outside bids with artificial first year bids and <br />change in coverage resulting in employees having to change their doctors. <br />Flint asked for clarification on how much the City pays. <br />Moorse reported that the Council had authorized the City to move in the direction of <br />providing the same amount of benefit dollars to all employees, regardless of whether <br />they have single coverage or family coverage. For 1998, fifty percent of the difference <br />between the single coverage premium and the City's ma.ximum contribution of $328, can <br />be used in the cafeteria benefit plan. <br />Flint noted that family members will tend to choose the policy that favors their family. <br />Companies are moving toward providing single coverage and making up differences for <br />family coverage through increased salaries. Moorse noted the City has been taking the <br />direction suggested by Flint that the difference between single and family coverage <br />should disappear as far as the City's costs are concerned. <br />Flint moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution No. 4002 approving the 1998 no**- <br />union pay plan adjustments as follows: A 3.0% pay increase, a maximum insurance <br />contribution of $328.50/month, and a mileage reimbursement rate of $.32/mile. <br />Kelley asked if the 3% wage increase was driven by the police contract. Moorse <br />indicated the 3% increase is somewhat higher than the CPI increase of 2.7%. Moorse <br />reported the police contract is up the end of 1998. Kelley wras informed that negotiations <br />begin in August or September of 1998. Kelley asked Staff to inform the Council of <br />wage increases anticipated and how they arrive at the wage increases as it directly affects <br />the other employees in the City. Jabbour noted the problem with looking at what other <br />cities pay, resulting in a chain reaction of wage increases. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.