My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
11-24-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:37:11 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:35:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
? <br />^ » <br />i <br />II <br />i ! <br />i i <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON NOVEMBER 10,1997 <br />(#12 - Telecommunication Antennas Lease Agreements - Continued) <br />the agreements. Barrett said the City does not want to have to work tlirough each <br />agreement as they come up. <br />Jabbour indicated that if tiv, water tower fil’s up with antennas another tower could be <br />erected next to it. This was done in the City of Tonka Bay. <br />A representative of one provider said the circumstances and values differ in each City. <br />He said the company did erect the antenna with a reduction in their rent to allow that city <br />to rent to others. <br />Jabbour noted that the next provider may be required to request a tower be erected. He <br />noted that the rents collected by Tonka Bay amount to 10% of their yearly budget. <br />Flint moved, Peterson seconded, to authorize Staff with the aid of City Attorney Barrett <br />to approve the lease agreements with Nextel and Spring Spectrum for <br />telecommunications antennas on the City's Highway 12 water tower within parameters <br />set by Staff and Barrett. Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />MAYOR/COUNCIL REPORT <br />There was no report. <br />ENGINEER REPORT <br />(#7) ORDER FEASIBILITY STUDY FOR SHORELINE DRIVE (WEST OF <br />HERITAGE) SEWER PROJECT - RESOLUTION NO. 3999 <br />Moorse reported that when the ten hot spots for sewering were identified, the area along <br />Shoreline Drive west of Heritage Drive, and the Heritage Drive/Heritage Lane areas <br />were included. Neighborhood meetings were held to determine interest. It was found <br />that the residents of Heritage Drive were not interested in sewer at that time. The <br />Shoreline Drive residents are ready to move forward as they have one failing system and <br />one system near failure. Moorse said the Shoreline Drive area can be served <br />independently from Heritage Drive. The Heritage Drive homeowners association was <br />recently recontacted to determine interest in sewer. There are now seven property <br />owTiers in favor of sewer and seven opposed. Moorse indicated that four properties have <br />conforming systems and one has a failing system. <br />Jabbour asked if the other three residents are aware of the pros and cons to sewering at <br />this time. Moorse said they were informed of this at the neighborhood meetings that <br />were held 2-3 years ago.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.