Laserfiche WebLink
Nevertheless, in the accepted context of zoning regulation, any action or object which does not conform to the current code is considered "non-conforming". Those objects which existed legally (i.e. were not considered to be illegal) before the code was adopted, are generally <br />allowed to remain "as-is" until such time that they are converted, <br />enlarged, reconstructed or altered...UNLESS the ordinance has a <br />provision that such uses must disappear, usually after a reasonable <br />amortization period. <br />The hardcover ordinance has no such 'sunset' provision. If one were <br />adopted, it would be difficult to require all properties to conform <br />totally, since many would have to remove structure or necessary <br />hardsurfaces such as driveways or sidewalks. Perhaps the most the <br />City could reasonably expect might be conversion of all landscape <br />beds to non-hardcover by a given date. This would require extensive <br />staff time for inspections, and the benefits gained might not outweigh <br />the ill will generated... <br />It is difficult and sometimes impossible to determine when various <br />items of hardcover were placed. The hardcover ordinance came into <br />effect January 1, 1975. Hardcover existing continuously since that <br />time is 'grandfathered', i.e. legal nonconforming. Any changes to it, <br />however, are only legal if they meet the current code. In a case where <br />hardcover exceeds the current code limits (and always when in the 0- <br />75' zone), replacement of old plastic with new plastic under decorative <br />rock beds would be illegal. And in the same situation, placement of any <br />additional plastic-lined rock beds would obviously be illegal. As noted <br />in the section on structural/non-structural hardcover, the City Council <br />has indicated that in variance requests, such hardcover placed without <br />benefit ofa permit and which results in excesses of hardcover, must be <br />removed and cannot be used as a 'trade-off. <br />C. Effect of Prior Variance Approvals <br />It is not unusual that structures or hardcover that were the subject of a <br />past hardcover variance approval must be replaced due to deterioration. <br />It has been City policy that a past hardcover variance approval grants <br />legal-nonconforming status to the approved hardcover as long as it <br />continuously exists. However, total replacement of a structure, even <br />with no changes to its footprint, height or design triggers a new <br />hardcover review and the likelihood that a new variance approval will <br />be required. <br />Further, any changes in the nature of previously approved hardcover