My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
11-24-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
11-24-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:37:11 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:35:08 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
229
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />r <br />Landscape Fabric. Prior to 1991 the City Council had directed that <br />landscape fabrics be treated as hardcover. In 1991 City staff <br />researched the various tjqjes of landscape fabrics available, most of <br />which claim permeability yet inhibit the growth of weeds. Staff <br />concluded that non-woven fabrics have a range of permeability 10 to <br />100 times as great as woven fabrics. Further, it was found that some <br />fabrics manufactured for other uses are treated with chemicals or resins <br />which make them impermeable and should not be used. It was also <br />found that some fabrics transmit water more readily when in contact <br />with the soil due to capillary action. <br />On May 28, 1991 the City Council voted 4-1 to henceforth consider <br />non-woven landscape fabric as non-hardcover when placed below <br />clean, permeable landscape rock, wood chips or similar materials in <br />landscape beds, and directed staff to revise the City's informational <br />materials to reflect this change. On June 17, 1991 the Planning <br />Commission questioned whether the Council intended that in the <br />extreme case a property owner could place landscape rock over fabric <br />to cover the entire 0-75 ’ zone. On June 24, 1991, the City Council <br />voted 5-0 to rescind the previous action pending further review of the <br />matter, especially in relation to prohibiting fabric use in the 0-75 ’ zone <br />but perhaps allowing it elsewhere. No further action has been taken on <br />this since the approval was rescinded. <br />It might be argued that dust and debris carried with runoff may clog <br />permeable fabric, making it impermeable. This has not been <br />researched by staff. Many property owners have commented that <br />because permeable fabrics are considered hardcover, the only <br />reasonable alternative for controlling weeds is the use of chemicals, <br />with the obvious disadvantage that overuse will result in such <br />chemicals running off into the lake. <br />Gravel or Dirt Driveways (as opposed to gravel decorative rock <br />beds). The City has concluded that all surfaces which are driven on, <br />whether regularly or only occasionally, are considered as hardcover <br />because they experience some degree of compaction. Therefore, gravel <br />or dirt driveways are considered as hardcover. Decorative gravel rock <br />beds without fabric or plastic underliner and which are not driven on, <br />are not considered hardcover because they are permeable and not <br />compacted. <br />Some propert>' ow-ners have requested that porous pavements or the so- <br />called ’grass pavers’ (a concrete or similar grid allowing grass to grow <br />in the interstitial spaces) be allowed as non-hardcover or partial <br />hardcover. Also, some have requested that concrete driveway tire
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.