Laserfiche WebLink
rniiMl 1WICATIONSJIEPI^DlVlSiON <br />DOCUMIr* -n^ <br />City of OROINO <br />,*6r6^W^ <br />a <br />RESOLUTION OF THE CITY COUNCIL <br />NO. <br />7. 4>Oih the proposed new buildinq site- and the nite with existing <br />residence arc similar in area to other common - ownership lots which <br />have been approved as building sites since 1984 within the LR-lIi <br />zoning district as follows: <br />M'-nesi-oad <br />L.91#G30 Smiley, 2720 Pheasant Road .65 <br />Vacant <br />Lot <br />.59 <br />11051 Clcsne, 1475 Cherry Place .68 <br />11084 M.ixficld, 4175 North Shore Drive .57 <br />#'.24 Lange, 4160 Forest Lake Drive . 40 <br />.64 <br />.46 <br />.45 <br />h.. Tho iotr. were created in tlie eariy 50's prior to the City's <br />doption of ordinances that v/ould have provided standards for the <br />devciop.r.er.t of rots. <br />9. Tho applicants have owned tho rots for approximately 30 year_. <br />10. Lot 1 contains no accessory structures an.d would aj.pe »r to seivi, <br />moreiy as aoditicnal area rcceivinn minimal ir.aintc.-.ir.c*.-. <br />n. Clcnn Cook, tho City engineer, is a rcpcit dated October 6, 1987 <br />ntat«jG t.ho following: <br />I <br />Development of Lot 1 on Kelly 7vvcnue will not re.sult in any <br /><lrainage problems for adjacent resident. <br />The run-off from the neighborhood is currently directed ro t i.*.- <br />ov/.ned property South of Lot 1. Development of thit, lot v;i i i <br />rer.Jit in ^;dditicnal run-off to the lake because cf an increase' <br />ir. hardcover, 'do do not anticipate that this increase i:. run-ofl <br />will cause any significant adverse effect on the lake. <br />12. 7:.e City Council has considered this applic-ation ir.cludit.g <br />reports I.y City staff, consmonts by tho applicant and the uffest of the <br />proposed vaiiancos on the health, safety u.nd welfare of tho rcnir.unitv. <br />• %^ ^ m The Ci-y Council fir.:ls that the c.ondi i ion s existing on this <br />property are j/C-culiar to it and do not apply genera ily to otner <br />ih this zoning district; that grunting the variances would <br />not adversely affect traffic conditions, liglit, air nor pose- a fir*"* <br />hazard or other danger to neighboring property; would not rereiy serve <br />as a convenience to tho applicant, but f r. necessary to alleviate a <br />ceir.or.strable hardship or difficulty; i«. n<;ccssary to preserve a <br />substantial property right of the applicant; and woulf] bo in keeping <br />V*! t.'i th(. spirit and intent of the Zoning Code and Comprehensive Plan <br />:>f tCity. <br />Page 2 of 5 <br />i