My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
10-27-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:22:06 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:15:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
M <br />I- <br />ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />(#4 - #2298 Conley Brooks, Jr., and John Brooks - Continued) <br />Smith voiced concern with this land acquisition making Brooks' property more buildable. Hawn <br />noted the peninsula was located in the 0-75' setback. Gaffron said it could be a concern in a different <br />arrangement but not in this case due to the setback and lakeshore. <br />Schroeder asked if the motion should include a scenic easement which will benefit the property <br />owner of 980 West Femdale and Robert Floyd. <br />Floyd noted that the covenants do not address the maple trees located on the tip of the point. Brooks <br />said he does have the scenic easement already and is willing to move the maple trees. Schroeder <br />noted that no easement would be required if he owns the property. <br />The special lot arrangement was explained. <br />Vote: Ayes 4, Nays 3, Lindquist, Smith, and Berg. Berg said she is concerned with setting a <br />precedent. Lindquist said the proposal is inconsistent with the Comprehensive Plan and the property <br />is not contiguous. <br />ACTION ITEMS <br />(#6) GARY AND BONNIE BIRNBAUM, 2695 KELLY AVENUE - VARIANCES - PUBLIC <br />HEARING 10:21-10:31 P.M. <br />The Affidavit of Publication and Certificate of Mailing were noted. <br />The Applicant was present. <br />Van Zomeren reported that the application is a request to renew a variance which has elapsed. Lot <br />width and lot area variances are required to allow the lot to be considered buildable. The 1.14 acre <br />property is located in the LR-1B, one acre. Zoning District. Van Zomeren reported the applicant had <br />indicated via a phone conversation earlier in the day that the survey that was submitted showed <br />inaccurate hardcover calculations as the concrete patio and other hardcover has been removed. Van <br />Zomeren said Staff recommends re-enactment of the previous variances subject to conditions noted <br />on page 5 of the memo. <br />22
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.