My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
10-27-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:22:06 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:15:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION MEETING <br />MINUTES FOR SEPTEMBER 15,1997 <br />(#4 - #2298 Conley Brooks, Jr., and John Brooks - Continued) <br />Jerry McCourtney, 1055 West Femdale, noted that this piece of parcel is the only beach area for use <br />by the area. He indicated that Mr. Floyd has use of the area for beach but has never maintained it. <br />McCourtney said Brooks has maintained it since purchasing it and would like to add it to his <br />property rather than see it revert to its prior condition. <br />Brooks said he would be willing to relocate the maple trees onto the shoreland on the other side of <br />the peninsula. He reiterated that the parcels would be combined. <br />Lindquist said he saw the detachment and reattachment as inconsistent. Lindquist voiced his opinion <br />that the peninsula should stay as part of the adjoining land. <br />Hawn said she was not against the application. Lindquist noted that there would be little pieces of <br />land but would be in support if the ownership was contiguous. <br />Stoddard was informed by Gaffron that he was unaware of any similar cases. Hawn noted a property <br />on Stubbs Bay that has shoreland with an adjoining island. Gaffron acknowledged this but noted <br />both are owned by the same person inland from it but separate tax parcels. <br />Schroeder indicated that the property would no longer be contiguous but noted the property could <br />not be developed anyways. <br />Gaffron asked if the Commissioners would allow the property to be sold separately from the 980 <br />West Femdale parcel. The Commissioners said they would not recommend that and only support <br />the proposal with a combination of the lots. <br />Schroeder noted that the process of special lot combination with covenant requiring City approval <br />for any changes would also require a public hearing before any transfer could occur. He indicated <br />by following this process, nothing could just happen as feared by Floyd without the public being <br />notified. <br />Floyd asked what rationalization or criteria is being used to allow this to occur. Schroeder informed <br />him that the applicant could sell the parcel to Floyd in the future. Floyd noted there was no way for <br />him to make future plans. Berg informed him of the right of people to sell their property.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.