Laserfiche WebLink
i <br />request for council action <br />DATE: Aug\ist21,1997 <br />item NO: \ <br />Department Approval: <br />Name RoaMoorse <br />Title City Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />City Administrator’s <br />Report <br />Item Description: <br />City PoUcy Regarding Burning Permits <br />Memo From Mike Gaffion RE: City PoUcy on Burning Permits <br />At the August 11 City Council meeting, the Council received itsident. As the <br />of brush.of brush. <br />•n,. city has had a suHct policy regarding bnah burning. It is my ® ^ » <br />to be offset by the availability of other brush «as beyond what corfd <br />citv brush disposal site. However, the amount J ® , disposal site in Maple Grove, the <br />be chipped by city staff. CoX site. Because this was a relatively <br />cltv bc^ to contract to have the brush hauled to th ty residents takmg <br />:xi^^prog.«m, the cit/s brush dispos^ sue ^ — ^quests to <br />'.fee for this service. .„„witha fee for this service. <br />Recently in talking with other ciUes. staff has <br />S mb grinder that grinds the brush into ctaps at »t -^e ^I possible for <br />^e available to residents. B^d on brush disposal site throu^ <br />■ity to recover all or a sigmficant portion ^ of providing a disposal site would <br />rwed for the use of the site. The most difficult demen ot p S staff would contact <br />Sc city to recover all or a significant portion of Ae coste °2'°?ofIfroviding a disposal site would <br />adjacent cities regarding a joint brush disposal site. <br />^ !•___Viiiminfi ES E WEy 01 <br />adjacent cities regarding a joim oriu>n ^ <br />sviSi a more convenient option for brash disposal. <br />COOTICIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to confirm the city's burning permit policy. <br />I <br />r-wttr-