My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-27-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
10-27-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:22:06 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:15:29 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
352
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
[ <br />request for council action <br />DATE; August 21,1997 <br />ITEM NO: | <br />Department Approval: <br />Name RonMoorse <br />Title City Administrator <br />Administrator Reviewed: <br />Item Description: <br />City Policy Regarding Burning Permits <br />Agenda Section: <br />City Administrator’s <br />Report <br />Attachment: Memo From Mike Gaffron RE: City Policy on Burning Permits <br />At the August 11 City Council meeting, the Council received public comments regarding both the <br />city ’s burning peiimt policy and the availability of a brush disposal site for Orono residents. As the <br />attached memo from Mike Gaffron indicates, the two are related in that both relate to the disposal <br />of brush. <br />The city has had a strict policy regarding brush burning. It is my understanding this strict policy was <br />to be offset by the availability of other brush disposal options. Initially the option provided was a <br />city brush disposal site. However, the amount of brush brought to the site was beyond what could <br />be chipped by city staff. When Hennepin County opened a brush disposal site in Maple Grove, die <br />city began to contract to have the brush hauled to the Coimty site. Because this was a relatively <br />expensive program, the city's brush disposal site was eliminated in favor of Orono residents taking <br />their brush directly to the County site. Since then the city has received numerous requests to <br />reinstate a local brush disposal site. These residents have generally indicated a willingness to pay <br />a fee for this service. <br />Recently, in taking with other cities, staff has become aware of the availability of a contractor with <br />a large tub grinder that grinds the brush into chips at a reasonable cost. These chips can then be <br />made available to residents. Based on comments from residents it appears it would be possible for <br />the city to recover all or a sigmflcant portion of the costs of providing a brush disposal site through <br />fees charged for the use of the site. The most difficult element of providing a disposal site would <br />be to identify a workable site. If the Council is open to pursuing this option, staff would contact <br />adjacent cities regarding a joint brush disposal site. <br />It is staffs recommendation that the city continue its policy of discouraging burning as a way of <br />disposing of brush. It may be necessary to provide a seasonal brush disposal site to provide residents <br />with a more convenient option for brush disposal. <br />COUNCIL ACTION REQUESTED <br />Motion to confirm the city's burning permit policy. <br />.i <br />«
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.