My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:09:37 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MEmrS OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCH^ <br />MEETECG HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#5 - #2279/#2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Gafifron clarified the location of the public versus private roadway. Kelley was informed <br />that no homeowners association exists. Whitehead would grant easements for the <br />driveway. Gafiron said granting right-of-way to the City for the road segment was <br />preferred rather than an easement. <br />Kelley asked whether an easement rather than road dedication would be desirable, given <br />potential need to upgrade the road. Gafiron acknowledged that option but feh the right- <br />of-way should be obtained. Kelley noted that would then require the road to be brought <br />up to standard by the City. Gafiron reported that the City has many dedicated roadways <br />that are not maintained. He suggested that since the majority of the cul-de-sac was <br />acquired, so should the public right-of-way be acquired. Kelley said the City would not <br />upgrade the road without the homeowners sharing in the cost. <br />Jabbour said a policy should be set regarding this issue. <br />Winston suggested an easement be granted. <br />Gaffiron asked Kelley if he was suggesting a private outlot with road continuing on it. <br />Kelley said he did. Gafifron indicated that the option had been discussed. <br />Kelley asked if the size of the drainfields were tested for a particular number of <br />bedrooms. Gafiron said the criteria used was for five bedrooms. Whitehead said he <br />believed the testing proved adequate for larger than that requisite. Gregory said the <br />homes will be in excess of 4000 s.f and use mound septic systems. <br />Kelley asked if Outlot A was being given by Whitehead. GafiBron said the Planning <br />Commission suggested the required bufier, leaving it as a separated outlot to serve as a <br />boundary and limit possible encroachment. A possibility is that Oudot A could be owned <br />by the Stankovsky's. >Yithout Oudot A, the Stankovsky property would be sub-standard. <br />A back lot is provided for the road. It was noted that unless it is owned by the <br />Stankovsky's, it cannot be used for setback purposes. <br />Paul Pesek said he is concerned if the public road is extended. He is also concerned with <br />drainage from the additional hardcover and from a 50' wide road. Gafifron reported that <br />the preliminary plat defines the driveway which is connecting and tilted into the slope <br />forcing drainage to flow to the north. Conditions include submittal of an acceptable <br />driveway plan. <br />Gregory showed that there is a proposed berm is between the driveway and existing <br />street indicating the drainage will flow across to the intersectioa It appears that most of <br />the drainage goes across into the wetland. <br />Pesek said the drainage goes east along his drainfidd.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.