Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#5 - #2279/#2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Outlet B is to be a shared driveway with Lot 2. Lot 3 has an existing driveway. <br />Consideration was given to bringing Lot 3’s driveway into the prope^, but this would <br />cause loss of trees. The Planning Commission recommended maintaining the easement. <br />Additional right-of-way is proposed to be dedicated at the southeast comer of Lots 2 ami <br />3, but the road east of the property would remain as a private easement. Iinprovements <br />may be required in the future to shift the private road to improve the sight lines at this <br />location. <br />Gaffton reported that the initial proposal with cul-d?-sac included additional ponding. <br />With no road being proposed, the developer has suggested that no pond would be <br />necessary. This would be subject to MCWD approval. Staff may need to see some <br />runoff controls in place but the need for ponding appears to be minimal. <br />Gaffron said the property is 10 acres in size with lots averaging 3 acres. There are steep <br />topographies and the drainage area is small The City Engineer has ^ggested that it^ <br />the responsibility of the applicant to upgrade Lyman Avenue, which is r^ently pav^ <br />from Smith Avenue to a certain point, but only 15' in width. The Planning Co^ssion <br />recommended partial responsibility by the applicant for the upgrade. The applicant did <br />not believe it made sense to improve the road if sewering were to occur in the future. He <br />also felt that with oiJy two additional homes, he should not be responable for the road <br />upgrade. The Planning Commission left this decision to the Council's discretion. <br />Regarding the public right-of-way vacation, a segment of platted lane will be vacated. <br />Gaffron sad no negative comments have been received from either the public, DNR, or <br />utilities. <br />A conservation and flowage easement is required for the wetlands. Gaffron said <br />preliminary plans have been received for the driveway for Lots 1 and 2. "nie applicant <br />will be required to ensure that drainage does not negatively impact the neighborhood. <br />Gaffron noted that the Planning Commission was sensitive to the needs of the <br />Stankovsky property. <br />Jabbour reported that the Planning Commission had asked for assistance by the City <br />Engineer with improving the site lines on the road. No specific steps were taken, <br />however. The resolution includes identified possibilities. <br />Jabbour said he was concerned with the City granting a variance on a septic site. Gaffron <br />indicated that the primary site for Lot 2 would be in close proximity to the road. A <br />revised alignment received on this date shows the edge of the septic site 5' from the <br />dedicated road. It would not meet the 30 mph, 270' radius, only a ISO' radius. Gaffron <br />asked Cook whether additional right-of-way should be acquired. Cook said he would <br />recommend additional right-of-way be acquired with the steep bank. An adNnsory curb <br />sign for 20 mph would serve the area.