My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:09:37 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON APRIL 14,1997 <br />(#6 - #22 12 Rebers - Continued) <br />Pflam said the applicant's major objection to the frontage road is the property is zoned <br />commercial and ailready has legal access to Hwy 12 The applicant u ^s not currently <br />have plans for Outlot F and would agree to revisit the frontage road issue when that <br />property is developed. Pflam said the applicant is seeking a buyer who would use the <br />entire property rather than subdivide it into smaller lots. Pflam said the service road is <br />laid out for use by a large number of businesses and, as such, would not be needed if only <br />one business was developed on Outlot F. <br />Pflam asked for approval of the outlot to buildable lot status. The applicant does not <br />want to reorient the lot to the rear and lose Hwy 12 access. Pflam said he felt the City <br />does not have the resources to fund the service road. Pflam said the comprehensive plan <br />has been affected dramatically by the relocation proposal of Hwy 12. <br />Pflam indicated it was discussed at the Planning Commission meeting for a right turn in <br />and out with a median. Commissioners raised the question •■■i relocating the access to the <br />west to line up with Brimhall. Pflam said he discussed this possibility with Mn/DOT, <br />who owns the triangular piece of property. The applicant has applied for a permit for <br />such an access. Pflam indicated the median is ^Yide enougli to support a stacking lane it <br />needed. Pflam said this access could be used by the Rebers and Otten properties. <br />Pflam asked for approval of the replat to a buildable lot without P ' of access to Hwy <br />12. He said the applicant is prepared to meet all conditions inclu , the 60' wide right- <br />of-way for a future road or trail. <br />Cliff Otten said he agrees with the plan as presets 1 by Pflam for access. He said he does <br />not see any need for a service road. Otten an . K.ebers informed Jabbour that they were <br />planning their properties in light of the Alternate 6 proposal for Hwy 12. <br />Kelley asked for clarification on the covenants on the property if an easement was <br />granted. Gafffon reviewed the easement limitations as noted on page 4 of the 4/10/97 <br />memo. <br />Goetten noted she agreed with Staff regarding the service load but questioned whether <br />the City can legally enforce it with the pre-existing conditions Radio said he thought it <br />would be difficult for the City to require construction of the service road. <br />Kelley asked if the applicant would be willing to combine access for the bank property <br />(Outlot E) with the Wear property. Pflam said he would be willing to discuss this <br />possibility with Staff and Planning Commission. Kelley was concerned that people would <br />drive through tb Vear lot to the bank property. Pflam said a barrier could be built.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.