Laserfiche WebLink
:il <br />ge <br />;ar <br />gh <br />13. <br />Thereafter, the Orono Building & Zoning Administrator and City Attorney <br />objected to certain terms of said easements; said easements were renegotiated <br />between the City and the Applicants; and a replacement public road easement <br />over Outlot D was granted to and accepted by the City subject to the following: <br />1. No road shall be installed by Grantee until a building permit has <br />been issued for construction of a commercial building on Outlot E, <br />SUGAR 'VOODS (in which case the road may extend no further east than <br />the f ' s<»he>rly extension of the East boundary of Outlot E) or on Outlot <br />F, SUIiAR woods (in which case the road may extend the full length <br />1 f Dv <br />”2. Tlf? >j»uth edge of any road built by grantee shall be no further North <br />than tlx South boundary of Outlot D, SUGAR WOODS. <br />"3. If and when a frontage road or service road is built comiecting <br />Outlots E and F, SUGAR WOODS, across land South of Outlot D, <br />SUGAR WOODS, or an easement for such a road is dedicated, granted <br />or condemned, this easement shall automatically expire." <br />(Quit Claim Deed dated May 30, 1990, recorded June 25, 1990 as Registrar of <br />Titles Document No. 2105974.) <br />It appears that Interstate Highway 394 will not be extended along the current <br />corridor of U.S. Highway 12; it appears that a bypass route will be extended <br />from the current freeway terminus near the easterly boundary of Orono to the <br />intersection of Highway 12 and County Road 6. When this bypass is <br />operational, traffic on Highway 12 adjacent to the Property will decline. <br />However, the resultant traffic volumes on Highway 12 adjacent to the property <br />at that time are anticipated by the City to be at a level that would generally <br />indicate the need for a limited access highway. <br />Page 4 of 9