Laserfiche WebLink
0^ <br />9 . • • <br />f \ <br />past years been increasingly filled in to the point of threatening our ability.' to <br />get boats into the cove and to reach the shoreline of each of the properties <br />adjoining it. This thankfully has been solved for the time being b\‘ dredaina <br />done by John Brooks and Conley Brooks Jr. quite recently. But our concern <br />is to provide a mechanism that will guarantee that fjtiire owners of Lor } 3 <br />will not in any way artempt to prevenc the owners ofadjoinina properties <br />from keeping the waterway navigable in the future, even if it requirc.s <br />removal ot some portion of that land, as it is Lot 13 where the sand deposits <br />and the land actually grows into the waterway. <br />Finally, in the Cit}' Code book, page 431, Subd. 10 A, requires (shaf <br />include) that all issues identified in the subdivision have been addressed bv <br />the subdivider for (9) certification by the zoning administrator. As I strongly <br />feel that lias not been the case so tar in tliis series of subdivisions, not on the <br />part ot the zoning administrator, but in the actions of your commission and' <br />die O/irt Council. I am hopetul that there will be a more careful and detailed <br />consideration of all the issues involved in this application and those <br />involving all the adjoining properties before a decision is made on apA* of <br />these subdh ision requests or permits of any kind are issued on ihe.se <br />properties. <br />Sincerelv, <br />Robert T. Flo' cl <br />-S’