Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCU. <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#11 Shoreland and On-Site Sewage Treatment Ordinance Amendment - Continued) <br />The City had previously felt the Shoreland District should be a higher priority wth the <br />septic systems lacking the 3’ separation. Staff recommends failing systems be jpven <br />highest priority. <br />Gaffron reported that State regulations were reviewed and found to bt ever chan^ng. <br />The lepslature has recently changed the separation allowance from 3’ to 2' for existing <br />systems at the direction of the local government. This has a minimal impact on ^ono as <br />those not meeting the separation generally have been found to have less than a 1' <br />sQiaration. <br />Kelley asked how the State regulation was interpreted without a set time frame. Gai^n <br />iixlieated the DNR had recognized that and suggested a 2 year replacement time penod in <br />its Model Shoreland Ordinance. <br />Jabbour stud he understood and agreed with the regulation but has found that the DNR <br />ordinance is for the greater state at large and zeros in on the small older cottages on rural <br />lakes throughout the state. Jabbour said most problems occur where the 1000' mark <br />touches a lot trigg ering the upgrade. Jabbour feels the City will be remedying the <br />situation and contmue to work towards it. Jabbour said he did not agree with a Planning <br />Commissioners comment regarding a longer upgrade time frame presenting a health <br />hazard. <br />Gafifron said both Staff and Council have the same goal of protecting Lake Minnrtonka. <br />Sewering is being done on the majority of properties around the lake. Gaffron said his <br />concern is with the time frame of 10 years in the Shoreland as being too long. He felt a <br />shorter time finme would be better. Gafifron suggested the sewer study regarding sewer <br />in the rural area be conducted and determinations made as to the extend of sewer in the <br />rural area; then the issue of septic replacement timeliness could be revisited. <br />Jabbour responded that he feels sewering is preferred by residents. If the current zoned <br />dentity can be maintained with sewer, the City may be able to sewer more properties. He <br />noted the highest density is by the lake. He agreed that all parties are attempting to move <br />in the same direction. <br />Jabbour asked Gaffron if he preferred a five year time frame. Gafiron said he would be <br />more comfortable with that figure. <br />Gaffron reviewed comments made by Septic Inspector, Steve Weekman. Weekman <br />questioned whether it would be fair to change the ordinance for those that have already <br />replaced their systems. Gaffron noted that this does not affect very many residents, <br />however. Some residents have placed funds in escrow for potential septic replacement, <br />and these residents will no longer need the escrow money set aside. This affects only <br />about 3-4 residents.