My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:09:37 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r f <br />} * <br />12. The granting of such variance wll not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, <br />but is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />The variances as proposed would serve as a convenience to the applicant as both the <br />applicant and staff have produced proposals more closely meeting zoning <br />requirements. <br />Issues <br />1.The lot area and width do not meet the zoning district requirements. While it is possible <br />to easily meet side setback requirements, meetmg hardcover requirements is more <br />challenging. <br />2.The southwest side lot slopes downhill from the house and proposed garage abruptly, <br />making its location there unfeasible. <br />3.An Oak tree 4' in diameter would need to be removed according to the applicant's plan <br />which would comply with required setbacks and hardcover. <br />4.The property was granted variances for height, hardcover in the O' to 75' lakeshore <br />setback, side setback, lakeshore setback and average lakeshore setback in 1988 for the <br />remodeling and expansion of the existing house. A provision of the resolution was if the <br />existing structure was entirely razed, the applicant must comply with lakeshore setback, <br />side setback and hardcover requirements in the 0'75' zone. <br />5.If the requested variances are not granted, the applicant could build a three car garage <br />meeting all zoning requirements, including hardcover, but would require the removal of a <br />significant tree. <br />6.The applicant has mentioned in their statement of hardship that they would also like to <br />construct a retaining wall on the north side of the garage, possibly further adding to <br />hardcover. The applicants should be asked if this is still their intention as it is not <br />mentioned elsewhere in the application. <br />7.While no variance is necessary, if the applicant chooses to proceed with the two story <br />option for their garage, the garage height would appear significtmtiy greater than the <br />house due to downhill slope of the yard. <br />§2291 Steven Sigel <br />1399 Park Drive <br />Variances <br />9/15/97 <br />Pages <br />1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.