Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />r <br />f'-t:- ? <br />i ‘ <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#5 - #2279/#2280 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Winston cited condition 5 where the applicant is to submit acceptable drainage and <br />grading plans. He suggested the resolution be modified for #6 to submit an acceptable <br />screening plan. <br />Jabbour said if it is not required to be done until the home is built, the homeowner may <br />want to make changes, ^^^nston agreed that the future homeowner could modify it. <br />Winston referred to condition #11 regarding payment for road improvements. He <br />suggested that be eliminated if not needed. He asked about the letter of credit required <br />for screening, etc. Kelley and Jabbour said it should be left in the resolution. <br />Jabbour said he would support amending the screening modification subject to <br />submission of a suitable plan before final approval. <br />Kelley asked about the southeast comer; whether it should be an outlot as owned by the <br />City. Flint and Kelley preferred the outlot with an easement as did Peterson. Goetten <br />said she would prefer to wtut until the need is shown to upgrade it when sewer comes in. <br />She noted there would be no connection between the cul-de-sac and the comer area. <br />Council determined that the outlot would be established with an easement. <br />Keller moved, Goetten seconded, to approve Applications #2279 and #2280 as outlined. <br />Stankovsky asked what direction was being taken regarding screening. Jabbour <br />explained that the applicant will work with staff with neighbor input. <br />Gaffion read through the conditions 1-11 for any changes and clarification. Under #3, <br />the sightline improvements will not be to a newly dedicated right-of-way but will become <br />an outlot. #6 will be changed to require submission of a screening plan that is acceptable <br />to the City. Goals are removed. #9 - an outlot will be platted for private ovmership with <br />underlying road easement for the City. The required curve radius will be 180* and posted <br />at20mph. #10 was eliminated. <br />Kelley siud he assumed that nothing would be done with the road curve unless the <br />homeowners want it to happen. Gaffron agreed. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(The meeting was recessed for a short break.)