My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
10-13-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 10:09:37 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 10:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
408
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MDOTTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 22,1997 <br />(#5 - ^2H9IU22%0 Marc and Tracy Whitehead - Continued) <br />Kelley asked what the difference was in elevation between the existing house and where <br />the hill be^s. Gregory said the difference is about 10' in elevation Jabbour said there is <br />an 18' elevation difference between where the garage apron is located and the Stankovsky <br />house. <br />i • <br />Goetten was shown where the garage is located on the existing Stankovsky house. <br />Gregory responded to the drainage concerns noting that the road would be sloped toward <br />the retaining wall side to allow drainage to follow the pavement. <br />Howard McMillan, 1275 Lyman Avenue, asked where the drainage travels from Lyman <br />Avenue. He indicated it follows the ditch line to the culvert. He is concerned if the <br />drainage spills crosswise and enters his property. Gaffiron acknowledged the concern <br />with adding new hardcover. <br />Jabbour was informed that drainage easements would have to be acquired for drainage to <br />the wetlands to the east. Gaffion said improvements will have to accommodate the new <br />drainage. He recommended the applicant be responsible for the cost of this drainage <br />improvement. Whitehead responded that there is currently no drainage problem. <br />Goetten said this should be decided before the final plat approval. Jabbour said it would <br />have to be verified. <br />Winston reported that the drainage can be solved with the driveway sketch. Whitehead <br />said a ditch had been dug on the north side of the road and a drainage pipe instaUed to <br />solve the wet road condition. <br />Flint said he feels screening is a problem. He indicated that buckthorn would be an <br />inadequate screening during the winter months. Winston asked to work with Staff on <br />these points of issue. <br />Jabbour noted there were policy issues on whether 1) the road should be widened; 2) <br />who will pay for the road improvement, and 3) what happens if sewer comes to the area. <br />Gafrron said the property is on the periphery of the Orono Orchards hot spot which is the <br />next highest priority. There is no proactive neighborhood group however. Gaffeon said <br />the Whitehead property is not within the MUSA bournlary but Stankovsky was included <br />as well as others to the west. Sewer would likely run up the road. Gaffeon said it was <br />not the City's intention to provide sewer to the Whitehead property but noted it would <br />not make sense to require road improvemems if sewer were to come in soon. <br />8
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.