My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
09-22-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
09-22-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:54:55 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:50:53 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
426
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />! <br />ii <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 18,1997 <br />(#12 - #2281 Hennepin County - Continued) <br />Brown clarified then that the City must approve affecting wetlands that the City has <br />annroved to fin. Gai&on said the Council listens to various concerns. He said the Council <br />understood there would be impacts on specific wetlands regardless of where the road was <br />located, and anoarentlv concluded those imoacts are relatively of; lower nrioritv than the <br />road alignment concerns. <br />Joel Settles said while he was not in attendance at all meetings, the Council weighed the <br />impacts on many issues to try to balance them out. <br />Lindquist moved, McMillan seconded, to approve Application #2281 per Staff <br />recommendations 1-4. Recorametidation #5 include the three items noted pertaining to <br />stormwater, septic systems, and ponding. The people who have any other concerns about <br />the CoRd 6 redisnment and other Questions were asked to sim uo. and Planning <br />Commission wiD recommend another meeting be held w?^h the County regarding any other <br />questions they might have. Mitigation will be 2:1 per State requirements with the strong <br />recommendation that mitigation occur within Orono. Settles said the determination will <br />be made by the State but preference can be stated. He will attach the recommendation to <br />the report certified to the State. Thcii asked the type of meeting and if held by the County <br />or Council. Lindouist .sasce.<«ted a nos-sible combination of both Council and Coiintv as a <br />public information meeting. Vote; Ayes 7, Nays 0. <br />Schroeder asked Settles if the mitigation siting is political in ngture. Settles did not feel it <br />was as such. He noted a number of people haye seen the ability in selling wetlands. A <br />member of the public noted tiling down on form land. <br />Brown said he appreciated the Planning Commission listening to the concerns. Schroeder <br />suggested people call Council members if they have issues of concern. <br />(#13) TREE PRESERVATION ORDINANCE <br />This item will be reviewed at the Planning Commission Work Session scheduled for <br />Seotember 12.1997 at 8:00 a.m. <br />McMillan asked that information be provided on the background of the Sugar Woods <br />Dcvelooment. <br />Stoddard related that the Council asked that the Planning Commission review the draft <br />drawn bv the Park Commission recarding this issue for their recommendation. <br />Lindqiust asked that Park Commissioner David Beal be present at the work session.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.