Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />3. The dimensional standards in the code only apply to front lots not this back lot. <br />4. <br />5. <br />6. <br />D. <br />E. <br />Access requirements. <br />A. The access outlet is platted in a 30’ width and Outlet A is provided to accommodate <br />screening. However, drainage and snow removal must be accommodated within <br />Outiot B when the driveway is constructed, and a requirement of final plat approval <br />should be that a driveway design be provided for Outiot B prior to fmf. plat approval <br />incorporating the necessary retaining walls and drainage ways to ensure no impact <br />on Outiot A or the adjacent residence. <br />B. Outiot B may appropriately be used for access for both Lots 1 and 2. <br />C. The driveway within the back lot can be located at least 10' from adjacent lots. <br />Only 2 residents will be served by a driveway within the access outiot. <br />This section states "no access outiot may be platted abutting an adjacent outiot except <br />when the intent is to combine the two access outlets for creation of a public or private <br />road meeting City standards." Staff does not recall the reason for this back lot code <br />requirement, but it probably relates to concerns about creating lake access for <br />lakeshore lots. The two ways to address this would be to either grant a variance to <br />allow Outlets A and B to be adjacent to each other, which staff would have no <br />problem with given the intent of Outiot A; or to combine the two outlets into a single <br />access Outiot, still considering that Lot 1 is a back lot, still considering that it is <br />merely a driveway outiot to serve Lots 1 and 2, and placing covenant restrictions on <br />the westerly 20 ’ of Outiot A to avoid any disturbance of that area in order to preserve <br />its intent as buffer for the adjacent home. <br />This code section requires that "driveways constructed in access outlots shall be adequately <br />screened by fencing or vegetation at the discretion of the City, at all points to the rear of the <br />required street yard of the front lot, so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the <br />side or rear yard of adjacent lots". This means that a fence or other screenu.? needs to be <br />provided along the southeast comer of Lot 1 to avoid headlights impacting the adjacent <br />neighboring lot. <br />"The street yard of the back lot shall be adequately screened by fencing or vegetation at the <br />discretion of the City so as to eliminate intrusion of vehicle headlights into the side or rear <br />yards of adjacent lots." Since the street y?u d of the back lot is the east lot line, ^d intrusion <br />of vehicle headlights into the side or rear >ard of the adjacent lot to the east will have little <br />pact based on the proposed house location at the top of the hill, staff suggests there is no <br />need for this screening.