Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON SEPTEMBER 8,1997 <br />\ <br />(#7 - #2276 Julie and Brent Walton - Continued)Jabbour acknowledged that the lots cannot be made larger, and the end result is three <br />btitldable lots. <br />Goetten noted that years were spent by the Council to reach a resolution with Oberhauser <br />regarding the property becoming only two lots because of size. She said she is confused <br />on how to proceed questioning Council’s rescission of having only two lots instead of <br />three. <br />Jabbour said Oberhauser’s application was acted upon by Council with no follow to ugh <br />by Oberhauser. He indicated this could also occur with the current application. <br />Goetten said she understood that but questioned whether the Council was changing their <br />determination that only two lots exist. <br />Jabbour said it is his understanding that the City has no power to enforce the property <br />becoming two lots. <br />Kelley questioned where the access would be located for Lot B, whether off of CoRd 15 <br />or by shared access with B and C. He asked how many curb cuts were approved. He <br />was informed that there were two curb cuts for A and B from CoRd 15 but City <br />questioned the appropriateness of adding traffic onto CoRd 15 when an arterial route <br />could be used. <br />Goetten noted that this was discussed by the Planning Commission. <br />Mr. Walton reported that he has direct access onto Dunwoody Avenue. <br />Van Zomeren said Staff recommended B and C have a shared driveway from CoRd 15 <br />rather than Dunwoody Avenue. The Planning Commission thought otherwise and <br />^proved a plan with one driveway off of Dunwoody Avenue. <br />Mr. Walton displayed a photo of the property and curb cut on Dunwoody Avenue, which <br />he said he feels is safer. He indicated there is a natural tunnel of vegetation around the <br />driveway. <br />Jabbour asked Oberhauser if the transaction for Lot A was complete. Oberhauser said <br />the transaction^ was closed one year ago and the house has since been reconditioned. <br />Kelley said he supported the Walton applicat-.on. <br />Peterson said she also supported the application. She asked if structural coverage would <br />meet the 15% allowance. Van Zomeren said the plan is designed at 14.17%.