Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON AUGUST 25,1997 <br />(•#5) #2255 RICK RICE, 2700 KELLY AVENUE - VARIANCE - RESOLUTION <br />NO. 3945 <br />Goetten moved, Kell^^ seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3945. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays <br />(#6) #2264 JANET KIERNAN, 1491 SHORELINE DRIVE - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3946 <br />The applicant was present, along with Alan Christy. <br />Gafifron reported that an application for additions to the existing residence was reviewed <br />and approv^ one year ago, bm plans have since been revised. The Planning Commission <br />recently reviewed the application as well. The property located by Bracketts Point was <br />planned for remodeliog with additions to the garage. Existing structure and hardcover <br />were reviewed. At the time of appl3nng for the building permit, applicant proposed to <br />remove the entire structure and b^n anew with new construction. The plan included <br />encroachment of the side and 75' setback. The Planning Commission had recommended <br />that this new construction should include moving the house back from the 75' setback. <br />The currem revised plan will make use of some portion of the existing structure. The <br />applicant will make use of 40% of the existing structure. After the additions, the new <br />^ructure will be 80% new and 20% existiiig. The plan was reviewed with the building <br />inspectors. Ga^on noted that the code does not specify a percentage of existing building <br />that must remain to be con^dered as a remodeling. <br />TTw plans include a side setback encroachment. The 75' encroachment will remain as <br />exists. The average lakeshore setback enrrodchment will change as the nature of the bulk <br />and mass of the structure will increase in that setback. Gafiron indicated that the <br />Planning Commissioners felt this change would not impact the neighboring properties due <br />to its relation to and topography of the land. <br />Staff recommended approv^ of the application subject to the conditions previously <br />r^mmended by the Planning Commission. These conditions include no change to the <br />side setback, a change in the drweway, addition of a garage stall, meeting the 15' street <br />setback, and 27.6% hardcover in the 75-250' setback ftM” a 0.1% increase. <br />The applicant printed a computer scanned photograph of the area depicting what the <br />improvements will look like. Tree coverage was removed to allow the residence to be <br />viewed. However, the actual tree coverage will remain. Alan Christy said no additional <br />encroachment will occur into the setback of the footprint and only in volume for the <br />second story. <br />Jabbour was informed that height was not an issue. <br />1