My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:09:20 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
request for council action <br />DATE: August 21p|g^ <br />ITEM NO.: <br />Department Approval: <br />Name Michael P. Gaffron <br />Title Senior Planning Coordinator <br />Administrator Reviewed:Agenda Section: <br />Zoning <br />Item Description: ^2264 Jane. C. Kienum. 1491 Shoreline Drive - Variance ■ Resolution <br />^o^s“^'‘‘ sewer insullation in <br />Application; Revised side setback, lake setback, average lakeshore setback and hardcover <br />variances to construct additions to the existing residence. hardcover <br />List of Exhibits <br />A - Resolution <br />B - Notice of Planning Commission Action <br />C - Revised Final Proposed Site Plan and Elevations <br />D - Memo and Exhibits of 8/15/97 <br />Summary of Request <br />rISe roof o/!lI?exT,-“'" -H “hstruction of additions andrevise the roof of the existing residence, portions of which were located in the 0-75 ’ lakeshore <br />Tt^r ^ 2di“ <br />ras^f F * S^asl^^d all-^i^thr <br />In June 1997 when the building permit was applied for, staff found that applicant now intended <br />o remove tte entne superstructuro of the residence and reuse only parts of <br />also found that the plans submitted for the building permit had been sigm^cantl^v^ <br />the 0-75 setback as well as an additional encroachment into the 30* side setback. <br />Staff concluded that these new encroachments and the intent to completely remove the existina <br />residence, triggered the need for additional setback variances as weU a/a LTarL an^ S <br />variance, providmg the City with an oppormnity to have the new construction substantially meet
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.