Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD OiN OCTOBER 9,1995 <br />PLANNING COMNDSSION CO>DIENTS <br />There was no Planning Commission report. <br />PUBLIC COMMENTS <br />There were no public ccmments. <br />ZO.NING ADMINISTRATOR’S REPORT <br />(>*=3) S2044 GEORGE OLSON, 2775 SHADY^VOOD ROAD - VARLANCE - <br />RESOLUTION ??3610 <br />Jabbour moved, Goetten seconded, to adopt Resolution s=.?610 granting a hardcover <br />variance to George Olson of2775 Shadj'wood Road for the construction of an addition <br />to the existing residence. Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />(#4) #2049 CHIC DWIGHT/FRED GUTTORMSON, 1220 TONKAWA ROAD - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION #3611 <br />The applicants were present. <br />Gam-on reponed that the application is for a request for hardcover and lakeshore setback <br />variances for a number of projects. The applicants would like to replace the e.xisting deck <br />on the lakeshore side of the residence, buiid a screened porch below the deck area, <br />excavate to the south side of the residence for a walkout door, and constma low boulder <br />walls, all of which is in the 0-75’ zone. Tne current setback to the lake is 42 ’ from the <br />residence and 34 ’ from the deck. <br />During Planning Commission review of August 21, 1995, the applicant received a partial <br />recommendation for approval of a screened porch under the deck and deck replacement <br />and stairs. The appro^ was based on the deck not e.xtending past the south wall of the <br />residence. Excavation to the south side wall and retaining wails to allow a window to <br />become a doorway was recommended. The Planning Commission did not recommend <br />the installation of the low boulder walls between the deck and shoreline as there was no <br />justiheation or hardship shown. The approval was based on the condition that the small <br />patio below the deck be removed, as well as the small accessory building on the southeast <br />section of the property. The old gravel driveway was recommended to be top dressed <br />and revegetated %vith foil grass. The applicant was also asked to remove the deck by the <br />lake. Gafrron also noted that the DNR recommended denial of the deck and screened <br />porch based on the fact that the property is non-cenforraing.