My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:09:20 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />Mr. & Mrs. David Rahn <br />July 24,1997 <br />Page Three <br />9. The following systems are being considered for construction of a Code complying <br />footing system: <br />a. Underpin footings which will be exterior footings after construction. <br />b. Install pier system with footings at 42" depth spaced approximately 4 to 6 feet <br />apart along existing wall footings which will be exterior footings using footing <br />and grout filled foundation wall as grade beam. <br />c. Installation of A.B. Chance anchors spaced 4 to 6 feet apart using footing and <br />grout filled foundation wall as grade beam. <br />10. These alternatives are being studied from an economic point of view and a final <br />decision will be made in the next few days. <br />CORRECTIVE MEASURES <br />11. Based on observ'alions and analysis, the following corrective measures aie required: <br />a. Foundation footing system to set footing at 42” below grade. <br />b. Close crawl space opening in exterior wall with minimum 8" masonry. <br />c. Provide adequate column pads for interior framing. <br />d. Adjust grade to provide positive drainage away from the structure. <br />e. Tuckpoint and repair any damaged or cracked block or mortar joints. <br />f. Provide special inspections for installation of fooling modifications and <br />footing soil bearing. <br />PROFESSIONAL OPINION <br />12. It is my professional engineering opinion that based on a review of the proposed <br />addition, construction documents, on-site review and structural analysis, the existing <br />8" concrete block masonry is adequate as modified with the corrective measures listed <br />above to support the loads in accordance with the Minnesota State Building Code.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.