My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1950-2024
>
1997-1999
>
1997
>
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:09:20 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
r <br />To: <br />From: <br />Date: <br />Subject: <br />Chair Lindquist & Planning Commission Members <br />Michael P. Gafhron, Asst. Planning & Zoning Administrator <br />June 12,1997 <br />#2238 Chic Dwight & Fred Guttormson, 1220 Tonkawa Road - Variances - <br />Continuation of Public Hearing <br />Zoning District: <br />Application: <br />LR-IB Single Family Lakeshore Residential <br />A. Request for after-the-fact lakeshore setback, 0-75' hardcover variances for <br />enclosure of room below pre-existing deck. <br />B. Request for 75-250' hardcover variance for construction of detached 30' <br />X 32' garage. <br />Lbt of Exhibits: <br />A - Planning Commission Minutes of May 19 <br />B - Memo & Exhibits of May 14 <br />Staff and applicants met on the property June 3 to discuss further options. A number of concepts <br />were discussed including: <br />Re-orienting the proposed garage to allow a revised driveway loop with less <br />encroachment into the 0-75' zone. <br />Relocating the driveway loop nearer Tonkawa Road for the same purpose. <br />Eliminate the loop in the yard, develop a second access to Tonkawa <br />further south. <br />Parking and access are the applicants' greatest concerns, as is property security given the <br />proximity of the new Maxwell Bay access. <br />Staff and applicants reached no specific conclusions. Planning Commission and applicant should <br />discuss whether any of the new concepts have the ability to solve applicants concerns and meet <br />Planning Commission's goals for this property. <br />The staff memo and exhibits of May 14 are attached for reference.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.