My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
08-25-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
8/1/2023 9:09:20 AM
Creation date
8/1/2023 9:05:55 AM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
380
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
' <br />MINUTES OF THE ORONO PLANNING COMMISSION <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 16,1997 <br />^9 - #2248 David and Jodi Rahn - Continued) <br />He nofrthe ^ ^ "<> P'ans <br />to get a good sense of the Javout aifn ^ P^^sent property after living there for a while <br />future garage would be outside the 0 Sarage. He indicated the <br />h= need^i a 35. e«bac. ““ <br />- - wo.d <br />^3’'^fteX« ' v ”'*^ =‘^'* "“W be located <br />had coi^dered a twoXX'XTl^XJhX.' Xid <br />pS ''“"y “"’ “ '•«P <br />Smth said she had a problem supporting a plan with doubling hardcover in the 0-75' and <br />asked tor less impact in this setback. Rahn said the current house is 600 s.f and the <br />^ nimimum at 1,300 gross floor area. He noted the residence next door is <br />at a 29/. coverage and was built in 1983 which has the same standards as currently exists. <br />He noted a lot line rearrangement in 1961 deemed the property buildable <br />There were no public comments at this time. <br />Lindqum noted that buildable properties are allowed 15% structural coverage and the <br />propos^ IS at 1328 s.f Concern was voiced with the structure location in the 0-75' but <br />Lindquist noted there is no other location in which the structure can be located. <br />Lindquist moved, Schroeder seconded, to approve Application #2248 for a conditional <br />use permit for I^d alteration for setback in the flood plain, hardcover at 19%, lakeshore <br />setback as existmg, and side setback if necessary. <br />ScJuoeder inquired if a side yard setback is required even though no changes are made due <br />o ^ e onginal vari^ce required for the property. If necessary, a side yard setback <br />variance would be included in the above motion. <br />Vote: Ayes 5, Nays 0. <br />r r^.i r"» f It * --1
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.