Laserfiche WebLink
6.LINDQUIST & VENNUM p.l.l.p.4200 IDS Center 80 South Eighth Street 8'^ Q>In Denver ^ ^UNOQUtST, VENNUM & CHRISTENSEN P ULP.600 17th Street . Suite 2125Minneapous. Minnesota 55402-2205 Denver . Colorado 80202-540 1 <br />TelEPH0NE:812-371.3211 T elephone : 303-573-5900 <br />Attorneys At Law <br />Robert C. Mitchell, Jr. <br />(612)371-3262 <br />rmitchell®lindquisLcom <br />August 8, 1997 <br />Mr. Kevin W. DeVore <br />IIiff & Associates, P.A. <br />Americana Bank Building <br />5050 France Avenue South - Suite 240 <br />Edina, MN 55410 <br />Re: Mr. and Mrs. Charles Floyd <br />960 West Ferndale Road <br />Wayzata, Minnesota <br />Dear Kevin: <br />I have your two letters dated July 17, 1997. It appears that there are some factual <br />matters which we can clarify. I asked Mark Gronberg, the surveyor, to put some additional <br />data on the dock layout previously sent. The new data is on the dock layout enclosed. As <br />you can see, the new data shows that there is about 50 feet of shoreline. <br />One dock accommodating 2 fairly large boats can fit within the ' dock use area' as <br />specified in the Lake Minnetonka Conservation District ordinances. For your benefit, I <br />enclose the pertinent portions of LMCD Ordinance Section 2 defining the allowable extent <br />of a dock use area. In this case, the side setbacks required are 10 feet. The dock may <br />extend out 60 feet in o the lake, except that room for navigability must be made for John <br />Brooks, the lagoon user to the east. Consequently, the dock proposed does not extend the <br />full 60 feet. Obviously you could reconfigure the dock and/or make the boat slips smaller <br />to accommodate more , but smaller, boats rather than 2 large boats. <br />I am somewhat perplexed about some of your legal conclusions. The law of <br />municipal (City of Orono) road right of ways is quite well understood having been worked <br />EB01;920054 1