Laserfiche WebLink
Zoning File #2269 <br />July 17,1997 <br />Femdale Road, which use apparenUy has no. been fonnaliy documented in City <br />records. <br />• n tho width of Femdale Road right-of-way, which on <br />Resolve of issues concerning oronertv but on the plat maps appears <br />the survey appears to be shown as pn P ^ whether Parcels B, C and <br />to be dedicated right-of-way. ^ Hennepin County <br />D are legitimately created parcels (they do not appear <br />plat maps as separate parcels). <br />Attorney Robert Mitchell, acting “d i^awme to the/may require <br />informally discussed some of these issues with statt, ana <br />additional formal applications and/or City approvals. <br />Discussion <br />staff is in complete support f‘^.^o <br />Femdale and split the property- between the adjacent west lot line, <br />house encroaches into (or at least abu s) -o-therlv half of the house, is within 75’ of theFurther, virtually all of this property except^ ed <br />lake where no new to grant difficult variances for <br />division/recombination avoids the City be g q <br />construction of a new residence on the property. <br />The property at 1045 West Femdale also includes That garage <br />one of which contains an existing garage that en removed. Mr. Mitchell has <br />hjcation. That issue has not been addressed as part o <br />In Exhibit F, staff has sketched the “”^dy acro^^ bhe 980 residence <br />parcel to be divided will be (^er combination as proposed, with *e <br />X'- '• Xlm ttdmically allow a legal combination across the <br />stipulation that if Hennepin County wi Femdale to execute a Special Lot <br />road, it would be necessary for the ,h/separat^^ parcels, defining Uie <br />Combination resolution to be filed on Xrship separation without <br />;st;; ,-n.—» <br />a third party with intent to develop it. <br />fASi