Laserfiche WebLink
4. <br />5. <br />C. <br />D. <br />6.A sMIar variance was approved for this property on June 24 <br />between to <br />4Stohe“l-H*‘ proposal is to the additions encroaching <br />within the side yard will now be two stories in height insteadTf <br />one s oiy m height. Planning Commission finds that this change <br />in hei^t to no additional impact on views of the lake enjoyfd <br />by neighbomg property owner, and will have no significmt <br />impact on visual density in the neighborhood. <br />toe 2k defined as (lake setback of the neighbonng house to the east since the neiohiv.r;, <br />property to the west is nearly one^uarter Hi^! <br />the. iicignoonng nouse to the east since the <br />2v^f to eT." ron'iitotX'Satta u A existing garage and subsequent construction of a new <br />attached garage room additions, and second story, will result in less <br />encroachment of the average lakeshore setback than currently existe 'Z <br />Thrnlid?br “^^"* approximately 90*, and this will rLuce to ^ <br />The neighbonng property will have no additional views encroached bv <br />o%^rri“ <br />a4en“‘m* “>=roaches within 123’ of to OHWL of Lake <br />whTch wire2c?^I"l'®"''’''® additionsmen will encroach only as near as 140 ’ from Lake Classen is a <br />by the applicants and the effv* ^ f *h reports by City staff, comments <br />an^d weSTtotnIlLto;®' <br />^’d^ros on *is property are peculiar <br />Page 3 of 6