Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />8. <br />9. <br />7. The Board or Council may permit as a variance the temporary use of a one-family dwelling <br />as a two-family dwelling. <br />Not applicable. <br />The special conditions applying to the structure of land in question are peculiar to such <br />property or immediately adjoining property. <br />Many of the lots in this area are not conforming as to lot width and lot area. Several of the <br />residences were constructed within the 0-75' shoreline setback. <br />The conditions do not apply generally to other land or structures in the district in which said <br />land is located. <br />Some of the zoning lots in this area do not meet minimum lot area requirements. <br />10. The granting of the application is necessary for the preservation and enjoyment of a <br />substantial property right of the applicant. <br />The applicants will need to provide testimony regarding the need for the variances based on <br />preservation of their property rights and use and enjoyment of the zoning lot. <br />11. The granting of the proposed variance will not in any way impair health, safety, comfort, <br />morals, or in any other respect be contrary to the intent of the Zoning Code. <br />The variance will not impair health, safety, comfort or morals. <br />12. The granting of such variance will not merely serve as a convenience to the applicant, but <br />is necessary to alleviate demonstrable hardship or difficulty. <br />*nie existing structure is located vvithin the 0-75' setback, and 5.3’ from the south property <br />line. Much of the zoning lot is impacted by the floodplain contour. <br />Issues <br />1. The zoning lot does not meet lot area, lot width or side yard requirements. The existing <br />sUiicture conforms to the average lakeshore setback but is within the 0-75' setback from the <br />shoreline. <br />2. Much of the zoning lot is below the 93 1 flood contour. <br />^2248 David and Jodi Rahn <br />J38SRestPt. RJ. <br />6/16/97 <br />Page A