Laserfiche WebLink
t <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON JUNE 23,1997 <br />r : <br />Flint ^ he does not understand how the plan would solve the problem Staff expressed <br />reg^dmg a collection to West Branch Road. Flint said there would still be no access. <br />Ciatfron said a future potential expansion would be present. As proposed, there would <br />now be a 7/8th mile long roadway from Wildhurst requiring a secondary outlet Flint said <br />the road would be near CoRd 19 and West Branch Road. He could not approve a plan <br />mcre^i^ the amount of additional traffic to Wildhurst and the cui>de-sac that would be <br />caused by the development and changing the overall look of the area. Flint questioned <br />how PRD could be approved without this problem of access solved. Gafiron indicated <br />^t a p-,>ssible consideration could be access to Highview. The appUcant is providing for <br />future i otenti^ access expansion. Gafiron said he previously posed many of these same <br />questions to the applicant. <br />Flint noting the configuration of the properties questioned the division of the Van Sloun <br />prop^ with access through existing West Branch Road. Gafton said that access was <br />inten^ to s^e only one house on that property due to the number of other homes <br />locked ott ot this potential private road. Flint also noted the DNR grant application <br />made on the Sollner property. Jabbour indicated that this was a moot point. <br />Flint indicated the Morgart property could be accessed from Wildhurst Trail. These <br />examples according to Flint show that there are other options for development. <br /><^on said many discussions regarding access to these properties have been held over <br />the nortfr^ providing access to the Sollner property from <br />FTmt said this option would provide access without overriding the City ordinance and <br />eluinnate impacts on the neighborhood. <br />Waters noted that another alternative would be to develop Garden Lane. <br />Jabbour informed Waters that it would be the responsibility of the developer to make the <br />improvements to the roadway and maintain the road as a private road. <br />Gafiron noted that the Sollner property is in one acre zoning and the responsibility of the <br />developer to provide road development. He said Waters expects to subdivide the Sollner property. <br />Jabbour indicated that even if the Council would decide to change the sewer policy, they <br />would request maintaining the two-acre density. Waters asked if a proposal with <br />sewering of two-acre parcels is viable. Jabbour said he was not suggesting that.