My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-23-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-23-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:15:20 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 4:08:14 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
348
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
\i I <br />#2240 - Sketch Plan <br />May 16,1997 <br />Page 3 <br />2. <br />3. <br />however, that Orono's current PRD ordinance (Section 10.32) does not allow for <br />such density increases... <br />Rezoning will require a concurrent amendment of the Comprehensive Plan. <br />MUSA. As noted above, the MUSA boundary was established at the time the Comp Pl^ <br />was adopted in 1980, based on 1975 zoning boundaries. The City has rarely revised the <br />MUSA boundary since then, except to accomplish the retrofitting of existmg neigh^rhoods <br />with sewer where septic systems were failing. The notable exception is Sugar Woods, where <br />the City allowed rezoning from 2-acre to 1-acre adjacent to the Long Lake commercial <br />district, primarily to preserve trees by avoiding clearcuts for mound-type sepUc systems, but <br />also to avoid a potential annexation. Arguably, sewer could have been provided for a 2-acre <br />development density. <br />It has long been staffs contention that due to septic system limitations imposed by steep <br />slopes, the applicant's properties likeiy would requite sewer in order to develop them, <br />es^ially the Motgart 10-acte parcel (See Exhibit B). This will require a MUSA <br />The City would have to gain Met Council approval for such an amendment. It is unclear at <br />this time what difficulties this might entail. The Met Council has in the ^t taken a >“S ^ <br />glowing view of Orono's rural residential development policies. A MUSA ^endment tha <br />preserves open space or provides affordable or lifecycle housing would likely receive a <br />relatively warm reception. <br />Sewer availability. Municipal sewer is available in Wildhutst Tral. <br />proposed additional 17 units is available. The developer would bear the cost »f <br />histallation, any lift station upgrades that might be necessary, “d 'Tmoiect <br />currently established at $7,445 per unit ($225 base umt charge, $4750 1970 LS-> Pr^“t <br />charge, and $2470 LS #10 Bypass charge). Credit for previously assessed umts, if any, <br />be subtracted from this. <br />Rnad lavout. The proposal calls for a linear roadway extending 1800' westward from the end <br />of Wildhu^ Trail, ending in a cul-de-sac, with an additional 600' d"veway servmg ^ <br />on Lots 14-15-16-17 to allow standard walkouts rather than front-walkouts. The result is tlw <br />Incomes essentially a 4,000' dead-end road, with a few side cuWe-sacs bm with <br />no secondary access. The subdivision code limits cul-de-sac lengths to 1,000 although there <br />are quite a few in the rural area of 1200-1500 in length. <br />From an emergency services standpoint, Wiidhurst is already a potential problem and the <br />current proposal makes it significantiy worse. The City has attempted to define <br />access ^ibilities for the Saga Hili area. The western <br />strategicaliy near a potential future connection to West Branch Road, alffiough <br />would be needed as well as a reconstruction of West Branch Road for this to be feasibie. <br />ti ' ■
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.