Laserfiche WebLink
r <br />#2247 <br />June 12,1997 <br />Page 4 <br />3. <br />that could potentially be a future park access road? How important is it to maintain a 35' <br />side street setback at this location? Can the building be relocated further north to decrease <br />the degree of variance needed? For instance, can it be angled to maintain at least a 10' setback <br />along the entire side street frontage, while still preserving the oak tree? Would a combination <br />of a smaller b ’.'ilding and greater setback be more appropriate? <br />Will there be a driveway to serve this building? If so, a second curb cut would need to be <br />approved. <br />Staff Recommendation <br />Staff does not recommend approval as proposed due to the potential future uses of the right-of-way. <br />A 10' setback might be reasonable given the topography, but a grading plan showing how 3:1 or <br />flatter slopes caii be maintained between the building and the original existing grade of the right-of- <br />way should ‘:*q>ared, and that may suggest a somewhat greater setback is appropriate. Preserving <br />the oak tree njay have merit; preserving the lilacs should not be a justification for variance approval. <br />Options <br />1. <br />2. <br />3. <br />4. <br />5. <br />Recommend approval as proposed. <br />Reconunend approval with revisions or conditions. <br />Table for additional information (specify). <br />Recommend denial, stating reasoi^. <br />Other <br />\J^& f <br />â€Ēs'i'- <br />*2- <br />I <br />P <br />7 ' <br />7 <br />\6» <br />'1/^' <br />^ .sJD ‘ <br />( <br />V <br />S CP