My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:58:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
WW" <br />C ity Finance In Minnesota <br />Municipal finance within the State of Minnesota continues to be contioversial, complex, and ever-changing. <br />Meeting the public’s increasing demands for accountability and more performance-based measurements, while <br />at the same time providing increased services and lower tax burdens, continues to challenge city councils and <br />administrators. <br />The following tc^ics highlight a few issues which may assist you in managing your city. <br />Pr’1 ! <br />t. <br />j <br />“I <br />-J <br />I • <br />C <br />iy <br />Legislative Activity <br />At the time of writing this report, we find ourselves in the midst of the 1997 Minnesota legislative session. <br />One hot topic currently being debated during the session that could have significant impact on municipalities <br />foils under the general description of Property Tax Reform.” Interest in some sort of property tax reform <br />has been simmering for years but has grown significantly since the February economic forecast from the <br />Department of Revenue reporting an estimated state budget surplus of $2.3 billion. Since tax reform <br />movements tend to involve the shifting of tax burdens between t)rpes or groups of taxpayers, it is commonly <br />thought that the best time to implement change is when the state has the financial ability to soften the impact <br />on those most affected. The common elements found in current reform proposals include accountability, <br />smqiUfication, enhancing the competitive position of Minnesota businesses, and general relief to all property <br />owners. Some specific proposals include levy limits for municipalities and reducing die education ftinding <br />reliance on property taxes by increasing the state ’s share of those programs. Although many believe that a <br />comprehensive property tax reform cannot be accomplished in the 1997 legislarive session, some changes are <br />likely to lu^ipen. <br />The following b a brief summary of the 1996 legblative issues and changes relating to city government finance <br />in Minnesota. <br />Restoration of Aid to Local Governments - Cities, counties, towns, and special taxing dbtricts will <br />benefit fi-wn the restoration of $16 million in cuts made to HACA in 1996. In addition, local <br />government aid wUl be increased by approximately $10.7 million for all cities (or an estimated 2.5%) <br />for the 1997 dbtribution based on the implicit price deflator adjustment that was adopted in 1994. <br />Temporary Municipal Liquor Licenses - No organization, registered political committee, or <br />locadm be granted more than one temporary liquor license in any thirty day period. However, <br />combinations of two, three, and four day licenses which do not exceed 12 total days in any given year <br />can be granted. <br />Sununary Budget Statement Publication - Cities outside of the metro area now have the additional <br />optKHi of including the summary budget statement in a city newsletter or other city mailing sent to all <br />households in the city rather than publishing it in the official newspaper. <br />Special Service and Housing Improvement Districts - Cities are authorized to establish special <br />service districts and housing improvement districts without special legislation. Upon properly adopting <br />an ordinance and meeting petitioning requirements, cities can collect fees within the districts and may <br />also issue bonds for improvement expenses. These special service and housing improvement <br />provisions sunset on June 30, 2(X)1. <br />-1-
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.