Laserfiche WebLink
fi <br />K <br />I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL meeting held on NOVEMBER 28. 1994 <br />(Saga Hill Tax Forfeit Property - Continued) <br />Steven Valek reported that he was the original owner of the tax forfeit parcel and when <br />he sold the land to a developer, a lot-line rearrangement was to have been done to allow <br />them to expand their rear yard. The developer lost the land and the rearrangement along <br />whh it It was never their intent to sell all of the land. Valek said he was denied the right <br />to reclaim the property as a result of the tax forfeiture. Valek asked the County to seU to <br />them approximately a half-acre to relieve some hardship due to flooding. Without use of <br />the property and the ability to maintain the drainage system, his property will flood. The <br />Countv- has recently agreed to approve his request and Valek is now asking for City <br />approval. Valek said this acquisition vnll not interfere with the rest of the land. <br />Moorse said the County is looking at expanding the area which is now a pond. Even if <br />the Valek’s acquire the requested property, an easement would be granted to the County. <br />CaUahan indicated he understood the acquisition of the tax forfeit parcel was an all-or- <br />nothine proposhion. Moorse said that although this was true, the County will allow the <br />Valek-s to buy a portion of the property. This was worked out over the past two weeks. <br />The Bridgewood Corporation is in the planning process of developing a 28-lot <br />subdivision over a 30 acre area, which is proposed to include the 9 acre tax forfeit parcel. <br />Mr Kiyzaniak of Bridgewood said their company is sensitive to the environmental issues <br />and the need for parkland. Bridgewood’s proposal is to trade two acres of wetland and <br />seven acres east of the tax forfeit parcel the Soskin property for the tax forfeit parcel. <br />Kryzaniak said the topography of the parcel is flatter and more suited to a residential <br />development. <br />Another representative of Bridgewood reported on the layout of the development plan. <br />He commented that the Soskin property is hilly , with a wetland area, trees. ^ a ravn^, <br />and would be good park land. It would be their intent to enlarge the wetland for runoff <br />and construct swales to maintain proper drainage. He also noted an accas if the Soslan <br />property were to become a park, it would have very good access from Wildhurst. Also, <br />the existing planed right-of-way is now located next to a sw’ale, and Bndgewood <br />considered this not to be a good location for a road.