Laserfiche WebLink
MB4UTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCTL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997 <br />(#13 - #2236 William Bockmann - Continued) <br />Van Zomcren sud the Staff report was completed from the survey submitted. She said <br />the surv^ indicates the existing garage location is 3' from the north property line but is <br />proposed at 2.6’. Acknowledgment letters from the neighbors we included. Van <br />Zomeren said hardcover calculations need to be redone as required by the surveyor. <br />Bockmann said there was a problem with the location of the nwghbor*s retaining wdl. <br />The submitted survey is wrong and the garage will be built at 1'. Van Zomeren said the <br />resolution would have to be revised to reflect this change. <br />Jabbour asked how this could be feeflitated. Van Zomeren said the resolution can be <br />amended but hardcover calculations need to be changed. <br />Goetten voiced concern with the garage location at 1' from the property line. It was <br />noted that the building inspector will require a fire wall. <br />Van Zomeren indicated that the hardcover calculations will probably not change from <br />those reflected in the memo, however, she indicated that the resolution will not be <br />certified until a correct survey is received. <br />Jabbour moved, Kelley seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3909 gituiilng a vjulaiice <br />for 1090 Loma Linda Avenue for a side setback variance of 1' for the proposed garage <br />addition with removal of the current garage out of the right-of-way per the re^lution as <br />amended. The well separation was noted as the hardship. The City Clerk is directed not <br />to sign the resolution until such time that the corrected survey has been submitted. <br />Goetten asked that the she be provided a copy of the amended resolution. <br />Barrett said the motion was satisfactory. <br />Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#14) #2237 JIM AND ROXANNE STASIK, 1270 WILDHURST TRAIL - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3910 <br />Roxanne Stasik was present. <br />Van Zomcren reported that the application is for a hardcover variance to replace an <br />existing deck over non-structural hardcover. There will be no increase in hardcover but <br />the variance allows the current 49.47% of hardcover to remain in the 75-250 setback. <br />The deck is located on the second story. The lower level hardcover will not ^ removed. <br />Van Zomeren noted that the deck replacement would not have required a variance if <br />completed board by board.