My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:58:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997 <br />#2230 GEORGIA HACKNEY, 2184 SHADYWOOD ROAD - VARIANCE <br />- RESOLUTION NO. 3904 <br />Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3904. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays <br />0. <br />(*#9) #2231 EVAN ANDERSON, 1260 SPRUCE PLACE - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3905 <br />Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3905. Vote: Ayes 4, Nays <br />0. <br />(•#10) #2232 WOODSMITH, LTD., 1520 FOX STREET - VARIANCES - <br />RESOLUTION NO. 3906 <br />Goetten moved, Flint seconded, to approve Resolution No. 3906. Vote; Ayes 4, Nays 0. <br />(#11) #2234 DOUGLAS E. WALDOCH, 4215 NORTH SHORE DRIVE - <br />VARIANCE - RESOLUTION NO. 3907 <br />The ^plicant was present. <br />Van Zomercn reported that the applicant seek** lot area and lot width variances to remove <br />the existing residence to construct a new residence. The lot is 90' wide requiring a 50' <br />variance. The property is .664 acres in the 1 acre zoning district. The Planning <br />Commission reviewed the application and recommended approval. <br />Van Zomeren reviewed the survey not'mg the existing house sits near the north property <br />line and the garage is located in the road right-of-way. More property is required for <br />conformity. <br />The applicant had no further comments. <br />Goetten clarified that the lot size is 28,905 s.f She requested a breakdown be shown of <br />any hardcover and structure in the 0-75' setback. She questioned a shed located in the 0- <br />75' setback. Van Zomeren was asked if the Planning Commission recommended removal <br />of the shed. Van Zomeren said they did not. She reported that the property met the <br />structural coverage allowance, and the Planning Commission did not discuss the <br />hardcover in the 0-75' setback. <br />Goetten recommended removal of the shed fi'om the 0-75' setback. The shed can be <br />placed elsewhere on the property. Goetten explained to the applicant the reason for <br />removal of hardcover m the 0-75 ’ setback not'mg stairways are allowed. 1 Celley and Flint <br />agreed.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.