My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:58:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
I <br />MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997(#6 - #2209 Spring HiU Golf Club - Continued)Jabbour noted that the applicant is willing to proceed with a trail along the perimeter of the golf c.ub. The City will in turn be the agent for the tunnel project. The Park <br />Commission provided a trail plan but the site is timhed by the wetlands. Council and <br />Staff agree that filling of wetlands for a trail would be bad poliQT. The applicant will <br />work with the Park Commission regarding the trail plan. Rint ^ work with the <br />applicant r^arding the trail plan. Flint said he is satisfied with the general conceptual <br />statements relating to the trail. <br />Council reviewed provisions requiring further auction. Regarding wetland nutigation <br />credits, Jabbour indicated that the applicant has asked for agreement to maintain a <br />portion of the credits to allow for buUding on site if necessary. Council approved. <br />Barrett asked to establish a date for the Developer's Agreement as noted under item 12 <br />on page 15. Crosby deferred to Gaflfron. Gafifron said some discussion was required. It <br />was noted that the Developer’s Agreement is required prior to grading. Crosby <br />suggested the Developer’s Agreement be completed in portions noting they are bound by <br />the use limitations. Barrett, Council and Applicant in agreement with providing <br />Devdopefs Agreement prior to grading. <br />Gafiiron said boilerplate is generally used as a guideline for the Developer’s Agreement. <br />He asked for Council direction. Gaffron noted areas requiring further detiul, the weir for <br />the Krueger wetland situation, road improvements, trail, construction damage to Spring <br />Hill Road, easements for ponding, and public and private expectations. <br />labour suggested Gaffron work wth City Attorney to draft the Developer's Agreement <br />Gaffron concurred. He noted that internal grading is not as critical an area. Jabbour <br />stated that the agreement is required before grading can begin. Crosby asked that <br />grading be in one Developer’s Agreement and the other issues be in another. Jabbour <br />asked that public improvements be taken care of immediately. <br />Kruger voiced concern with details regarding the weir on Wetland 17. He has only <br />viewed a letter from Braman on the subject. He would like to have a written agreement <br />with the developer to eliminate future problems. Jabbour indicated that the permit is <br />based on the plans submitted. Crosby and Braman said they would memorialize with <br />Medina an agreement with Krueger and present a copy of said agreement to Kruger. <br />Jabbour told Krueger to obtain a copy of the Council minutes for his record.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.