Laserfiche WebLink
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CTTF COUNCIL MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997 <br />(#6 - #2209 Spring Hill Golf Club - Continued) <br />Flint noted that the concept was to maintain animal movement. Jabbour suggested <br />adding "to maintain habitat". Crosby suggested the wording be placed under the trail <br />section and adding another under accessoiy structure and under a general category. <br />Moorse suggested the plans be referenced and show specifically where low opaque and <br />opaque fencing will be located. Crosby indicated that the trail plans have not yet been <br />developed. Jabbour agreed but noted that the reasons why fencing is or is not needed <br />should be stated. <br />Gafifron recommended adding Div stating "types of fencing which would restrict'i^dlife <br />movement are not approved and require amendment to the conditional use pernut".^ <br />Crod?y asked that the safety and separation issues be included to show legislative history. <br />Kelley asked that "generally" be eliminated. Moorse said the language should include <br />"subject to City approval". Cro^y agreed. <br />Kelley noted that there may be a future problem with cars driving onto Ae course. <br />Hunter said the Council could be approached if this occurred. Jabbour informed the <br />applicant that the Council is stron^y against fencing the course. <br />Page 13,9Bii, changed to "golf club related activities". <br />Crosby asked that a 9Biii be added stating, "other recreational activities limited to <br />members". <br />Under Cv, Crosby suggested adding, "and not reasonably listed under golf course <br />operation use". <br />Jabbour questioned who would define what is reasonable and what are related items. <br />Concern was expressed over the use of "etc" under Civ. The City would like to see <br />protection written in prohibiting use for large presentations. Jabbour indicated that the <br />by-laws can be filed on record to use as a benchmark. Gafifron said a copy of the by-laws <br />would then be required. Crosby asked to eUminate the "etc" and add "involving primarily <br />members and their guests". Jabbour asked *hat "primarily" be eliminated. <br />Barrett asked if the Council's intention is to allow wedding receptions. Kelley said it was. <br />Jabbour siud, while the kitchen is limited in its use, food could be brought to the <br />premises, and intensity of use should be considered. Kelley noted that the building itself <br />will inhibit the use. <br />Crosby indicated Civ could remain with "etc" eliminated and as noted above.