My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:58:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997 <br />(#6 - #2209 Spring Hill Golf Club - Continued) <br />KeWey asked Staff to analyze and document the condition of Spring HiU Road prior to <br />any cons^ction activities, and close the road to Spring Hill Golf Club traffic after the <br />collection IS completed. The developer could then be required to pay the cost of <br />repairing any damage to the road caused by the construction. Hunter agreed. <br />^Johnson smd a split rail fencing will be removed to access the septic site area if need <br />be. Jabbour informed that the road can be used if maintenance is required. <br />Flint supported the CoRd 6 access as preferred by the neighboring property owners. <br />Goetten also said CoRd 6 was the best access location. <br />Kehty informed the applicant to keep the load limitations in mind during the sprinn <br />months suggesting the house be demolished this summer. <br />Gaffion s^d a preconstruction analysis of Spring HUl Road can be done. Any damages <br />made to the road from construction wUl then be paid for by the appUcant. <br />^pa indicated that the letter of credit can include the estimated cost of repairing the 1 <br />accderation lanes, which will be paid for by the <br />Tom Cro% said he sent a letter to Dave Zetterstrom of Hennepin County o®rina the <br />bypaM t^ looted on the north side of the road. He noted that Henne^ County had <br />romidered cutting into the hiU but that proposal would be expensive. He asked S <br />ability to continue negotiauons with the County regarding road ■■ner..t^ <br />^bour smd the City has an interest in upgrades off of CoRd 6 and is in agreement with <br />^.n Coun^ reading the bypass lanes. which was a City request. <br />S““'araUon lane. Ga»on said it would beleasonable forthf <br />Ct^ty to request an acceleration lane suggesting details can be worked out He <br />questioned whether the acceleration lane would be required. <br />Goetten agreed with Gaffron noting most traffic will be westbound. <br />Ji^ur indicated that the applicant will have to provide the upgrades required by the
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.