My WebLink
|
Help
|
About
|
Sign Out
Home
Browse
Search
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Orono
>
City Council
>
1997
>
06-09-1997 Council Packet
Metadata
Thumbnails
Annotations
Entry Properties
Last modified
7/31/2023 4:07:47 PM
Creation date
7/31/2023 3:58:24 PM
Metadata
Jump to thumbnail
< previous set
next set >
There are no annotations on this page.
Document management portal powered by Laserfiche WebLink 9 © 1998-2015
Laserfiche.
All rights reserved.
/
433
PDF
Print
Pages to print
Enter page numbers and/or page ranges separated by commas. For example, 1,3,5-12.
After downloading, print the document using a PDF reader (e.g. Adobe Reader).
Show annotations
View images
View plain text
MINUTES OF THE REGULAR ORONO CITY COUNCIL <br />MEETING HELD ON MAY 27,1997 <br />(#5 - Telecommunications Towers and Antennas Ordiriance Amendment - Continued) <br />Donald Currier, 60 Cygnet Place, said he is an amateur radio operator. He is concerned <br />with the maximum height change for amateur radio operator towers from 65 to 55 . He <br />feels this is too restrictive based on information regarding his particular use. Moorsc <br />informed the Council that this change was recommended based on discussions with <br />DuBois. Moorse said the City is attempting to minimize the number and hei^ of <br />antennas, but the portion of the ordinance relating to this amateur use is minimal. <br />Jabbour noted that the discussions relating to this issue wU continue into the future. He <br />indicated that topography and other criteria enter into determining the height of antennas. <br />Goetten reported that a similar problem occurred regarding an amateur radio operator <br />tower on Fox Street. <br />Currier reported how the antennas operate and believes 70' would be a r^onablc height <br />for the need. His particular equipment would extend 5* beyond the 65' high antenna. He <br />asked for reconsideration. <br />Moorse said this portion of the ordinance would be changed or amended if the Council <br />recommended. <br />Kelley suggested leaving the height at 65' and asked how the figure was derived. <br />Moorse indicated it was not clear how the current 65 foot height restrirtion was first <br />determined. Goetten said the amateur radio operators should be notified of any change <br />to the height restriction. <br />Goetten and Jabbour both recommended maintaining the 65' height requirement. <br />Greg Korstad of Larkin-Hoffinan Law Firm was present representmg APT, a PCS service <br />provider. He opined that the two water towers would not be able to serve the entire <br />City. His client is under operation and unable to service Orono due to the moratorium. <br />He would like to see the moratorium end so providers may determine their service needs <br />in this community. He asked the Council to keep the issue open if the ordmance is <br />passed so the industry can move quickly and effectively in developing ant^a sites. <br />Korstad noted that the PCS providers are not in the buriness of constructing antennas <br />and would prefer to use structures currently in place. <br />Jabbour informed Korstad that Tom Alexander of his firm has previously addressed the <br />Council on this issue. He noted the ordinance was drafted with advice from a <br />telecommunications consultant. Jabbour indicated that Orono encompasses as well as <br />surrounds other cities where other antennas sites are available.
The URL can be used to link to this page
Your browser does not support the video tag.